Commons:Quality images candidates

Shortcut

• COM:QIC

↓ Skip to nominations ↓

These are the candidates for becoming quality images. This is not the same thing as featured pictures. If you want informal feedback on your photos, please ask at Commons:Photography critiques.

Purpose

The purpose of quality images is to encourage the people that are the foundation of Commons, the individual users who provide the unique images that expand this collection. While featured pictures identifies the absolute best of all the images loaded into Commons, Quality images sets out to identify and encourage users’ efforts in providing quality images to Commons. Additionally, quality images should be a place to refer other users to when explaining methods for improving an image.

Guidelines

All nominated images should be the work of Commons users.

For nominators

Below are the general guidelines for Quality images; more detailed criteria are available at Image guidelines.

Image page requirements

1. Copyright status. Quality image candidates have to be uploaded to Commons under a suitable license. The full license requirements are at Commons:Copyright tags.
2. Images should comply with all Commons policies and practices, including Commons:Photographs of identifiable people.
3. Quality images shall have a meaningful file name, be properly categorized and have an accurate description on the file page in one or more languages. It is preferred, but not mandatory, to include an English description.
4. No advertisements or signatures in image. Copyright and authorship information of quality images should be located on the image page and may be in the image metadata, but should not interfere with image contents.

Creator

Proposed wording changes to specifically exclude AI generate media from being eligable for QI see discussion

Pictures must have been created by a Wikimedian in order to be eligible for QI status. This means that pictures from, for example, Flickr are ineligible unless the photographer is a Commons user. (Note that Featured Pictures do not have this requirement.) Photographical reproductions of two-dimensional works of art, made by Wikimedians, are eligible (and should be licensed PD-old according to the Commons guidelines). If an image is promoted despite not being the creation of a Wikimedian, the QI status should be removed as soon as the mistake is detected.

Technical requirements

More detailed criteria are available at Commons:Image guidelines.

Resolution

Bitmapped images (JPEG, PNG, GIF, TIFF) should normally have at least 2 megapixels; reviewers may demand more for subjects that can be photographed easily. This is because images on Commons may be printed, viewed on monitors with very high resolution, or used in future media. This rule excludes vector graphics (SVG) or computer-generated images that have been constructed with freely-licensed or open software programs as noted in the image's description.

Image quality

Digital images can suffer various problems originating in image capture and processing, such as preventable noise, problems with JPEG compression, lack of information in shadow or highlight areas, or problems with capture of colors. All these issues should be handled correctly.

Composition and lighting

The arrangement of the subject within the image should contribute to the image. Foreground and background objects should not be distracting. Lighting and focus also contribute to the overall result; the subject should be sharp, uncluttered, and well-exposed.

Value

Our main goal is to encourage quality images being contributed to Wikicommons, valuable for Wikimedia and other projects.

How to nominate

Simply add a line of this form at the top of Commons:Quality images candidates/candidate list Nominations section:

File:ImageNameHere.jpg|{{/Nomination|Very short description  --~~~~ |}}

The description shouldn't be more than a few words, and please leave a blank line between your new entry and any existing entries.

If you are nominating an image by another Wikimedian, include their username in the description as below:

File:ImageNameHere.jpg|{{/Nomination|Very short description (by [[User:USERNAME|USERNAME]]) --~~~~ |}}

Note: there is a Gadget, QInominator, which makes nominations quicker. It adds a small "Nominate this image for QI" link at the top of every file page. Clicking the link adds the image to a list of potential candidates. When this list is completed, edit Commons:Quality images candidates/candidate list. At the top of the edit window a green bar will be displayed. Clicking the bar inserts all potential candidates into the edit window.

Number of nominations

No more than five images per day can be added by a single nominator.

Note: If possible, for every picture you nominate, please review at least one of the other candidates.

Evaluating images

Any registered user whose accounts have at least 10 days and 50 edits, other than the author and the nominator, can review a nomination. For an easier evaluation you can activate the gadget QICvote

When evaluating images the reviewer should consider the same guidelines as the nominator.

How to review

Carefully review the image. Open it in full resolution, and check if the quality criteria are met.

• If you decide to promote the nomination, change the relevant line from

File:ImageNameHere.jpg|{{/Nomination|Very short description --~~~~ | }}

to

File:ImageNameHere.jpg|{{/Promotion|Very short description --Nominators signature |Why you liked it. --~~~~}}

In other words, change the template from /Nomination to /Promotion and add your signature, possibly with some short comment.

• If you decide to decline the nomination, change the relevant line from

File:ImageNameHere.jpg|{{/Nomination|Very short description --~~~~ | }}

to

File:ImageNameHere.jpg|{{/Decline|Very short description --Nominators signature |Why you didn't like it. --~~~~}}

In other words, change the template from /Nomination to /Decline and add your signature, possibly with a statement of the criteria under which the image failed (you can use titles of section from the guidelines). If there are many problems, please note only 2 or 3 of the most severe, or add multiple problems. When declining a nomination please do explain the reasons on the nominator’s talk page – as a rule, be nice and encouraging! In the message you should give a more detailed explanation of your decision.

Note: Please evaluate the oldest images first.

Grace period and promotion

If there are no objections within a period of 2 days (exactly 48 hours) from the first review, the image becomes promoted or fails according to the review it received. If you have objection, just change its status to Discuss and it will be moved to the Consensual review section.

How to execute decision

QICbot automatically handles this 2 days after a decision has been made, and promoted images are cached in Commons:Quality Images/Recently promoted awaiting categorization before their automatic insertion in to appropriate Quality images pages.

If you believe that you have identified an exceptional image that is worthy of Featured picture status then consider also nominating the image at Commons:Featured picture candidates.

Manual instructions (open only in cases of emergency)

If promoted,

1. Add the image to appropriate group or groups of Quality images page. The image also needs to be added to the associated sub pages, only 3–4 of the newest images should be displayed on the main page.
2. Add {{QualityImage}} template to the bottom of image description page.
3. Move the line with the image nomination and review to Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives October 2025.
4. Add the template {{File:imagename.jpg}} to the user’s talk page.

If declined,

1. move the line with the image nomination and review to Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives October 2025.

• Images awaiting review show the nomination outlined in blue.
• Images the reviewer has accepted show the nomination outlined in green
• Images the reviewer has rejected show the nomination outlined in red

Unassessed images (nomination outlined in blue)

Nominated images which have not generated assessments either to promote nor to decline, or a consensus (equal opposition as support in consensual review) after 8 days on this page should be removed from this page without promotion, archived in Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives October 09 2025 and Category:Unassessed QI candidates added to the image.

Consensual review process

Consensual review is a catch all place used in the case the procedure described above is insufficient and needs discussion for more opinions to emerge.

How to ask for consensual review

To ask for consensual review, just change the /Promotion, /Decline to /Discuss and add your comments immediately following the review. An automatic bot will move it to the consensual review section within one day.

Please only send things to consensual review that have been reviewed as promoted/declined. If, as a reviewer, you cannot make a decision, add your comments but leave the candidate on this page.

Consensual review rules

See Commons:Quality images candidates#Rules

Page refresh: purge this page's cache

Nominations

Due to the Mediawiki parser code ~~~~ signatures will only work on this page if you have JavaScript enabled. If you do not have JavaScript enabled please manually sign with:

--[[User:yourname|yourname]] 11:23, 9 October 2025 (UTC)

• Please open a new date section if you are nominating an image after 0:00 o'clock (UTC)
• Please insert a blank line between your new entry and any existing entries
• Please help in reviewing "old" nominations here below first; many are still unassessed
• If you see terms with which you are unfamiliar, please see explanations at Photography terms

Please nominate no more than 5 images per day and try to review on average as many images as you nominate (check here to see how you are doing).

October 9, 2025

• 
  • Nomination: Sunset at Ngorongoro Conservation Area, Tanzania --Poco a poco 07:14, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Common ostrich (Struthio camelus), Ngorongoro Conservation Area, Tanzania --Poco a poco 07:14, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Common ostrich (Struthio camelus), Ngorongoro Conservation Area, Tanzania --Poco a poco 07:14, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Common ostrich (Struthio camelus), Ngorongoro Conservation Area, Tanzania --Poco a poco 07:14, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Ermell 09:00, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Common ostrich (Struthio camelus), Ngorongoro Conservation Area, Tanzania --Poco a poco 07:14, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Ermell 09:00, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Nea Michaniona --Lvova 07:10, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination A lattice in Thessaloniki --Lvova 07:10, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Mike1979 Russia 07:15, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination A door in Thessaloniki --Lvova 07:10, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Mike1979 Russia 07:14, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Previously unassessed Magda Barasku's sleeve --Lvova 07:10, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination A manhole cover in Thessaloniki --Lvova 07:10, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Mike1979 Russia 07:13, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Kazan Art College --Mike1979 Russia 07:01, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 07:05, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Kazan Marko House --Mike1979 Russia 07:01, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Giles Laurent 07:11, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Gnoeee 11:20, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Kazan Baratynsky Manor Main House Facade --Mike1979 Russia 07:01, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 07:05, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Kazan Vasily Aksyonov House-museum --Mike1979 Russia 07:01, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Kazan Okonishnikov Manor Wing --Mike1979 Russia 07:01, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 07:06, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Église Saint-Brice de Beuzeville-au-Plain, Normandie, France --AFBorchert 06:50, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Mike1979 Russia 07:06, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Église Saint-Brice de Beuzeville-au-Plain, Normandie, France --AFBorchert 06:50, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Mike1979 Russia 07:05, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 07:06, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The Dome of Berlin Palace in Berlin, Germany. --AusleseBeeren 06:50, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Beautifully taken. Was this in the morning or in the evening? --AFBorchert 06:52, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Lanius vittatus (Bay-backed Shrike) in Bhigwan, Maharashtra, India. --Tisha Mukherjee 06:41, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Giles Laurent 07:10, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Ortygornis pondicerianus (Grey Francolin) in Bhigwan, Maharashtra, India. --Tisha Mukherjee 06:41, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Giles Laurent 07:10, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Ortygornis pondicerianus (Grey Francolin) in Bhigwan, Maharashtra, India. --Tisha Mukherjee 06:41, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Giles Laurent 07:10, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Mike1979 Russia 07:12, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Ortygornis pondicerianus (Grey Francolin) in Bhigwan, Maharashtra, India. --Tisha Mukherjee 06:41, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Ermell 09:02, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Ortygornis pondicerianus (Grey Francolin) in Bhigwan, Maharashtra, India. --Tisha Mukherjee 06:41, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 07:07, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Argentine black and white tegu in Parque Estadual Encontro das Águas, Brazil --Giles Laurent 06:34, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Tisha Mukherjee 06:37, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Argentine black and white tegu in Parque Estadual Encontro das Águas, Brazil --Giles Laurent 06:34, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Tisha Mukherjee 06:37, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Chalk-browed mockingbird in Parque Nacional da Chapada dos Guimarães, Brazil --Giles Laurent 06:34, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Tisha Mukherjee 06:37, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Azaras's capuchin in Parque Estadual Encontro das Águas, Brazil --Giles Laurent 06:34, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --AFBorchert 06:54, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Giant anteater in Parque Estadual Encontro das Águas, Brazil --Giles Laurent 06:34, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Ermell 09:01, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination चरण तीर्थ धाम विदिशा --Dev Jadiya 06:16, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Noise, oversharpened --Jakubhal 06:36, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination IBM Quantum Computer Demo at ITUWTSA 2024, Delhi --Dev Jadiya 06:16, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline Insufficient quality: noise, processing issues. --Peulle 06:28, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
     Oppose Required PC not possible, lack of details --Uoaei1 06:28, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Bharat Madapam Delhi --Dev Jadiya 06:16, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Perspective distortion with too tight framing to fix. Noise --Jakubhal 06:38, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Desert at in ITU WTSA Gala Dinner, Delhi with Moong Dal Halwa, Jalebi and Gulabjamun --Dev Jadiya 06:16, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline Insufficient quality: low DoF, sharpness, unbalanced composition. --Peulle 06:27, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Jamun Tree in India --Dev Jadiya 06:16, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Too strong noise --Jakubhal 06:36, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Meursault (Côte-d'Or, France) - Saint Nicholas church --Benjism89 05:48, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Mike1979 Russia 07:04, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Meursault (Côte-d'Or, France) - Saint Nicholas church - Portal --Benjism89 05:48, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 06:29, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Meursault (Côte-d'Or, France) - Republic square, with Saint Nicholas church in the background --Benjism89 05:48, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Meursault (Côte-d'Or, France) - War memorial --Benjism89 05:48, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Dev Jadiya 06:00, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Meursault (Côte-d'Or, France) - Old castle (now hosting the town hall), with the fountain in the foreground --Benjism89 05:48, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Tisha Mukherjee 06:37, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Church in Goszcz, Poland by Marian Naworski --Gower 05:41, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Tisha Mukherjee 06:37, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Talbot bulk goods wagon, Behringersmühle --Ermell 05:38, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Gower 05:47, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Dev Jadiya 05:58, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Assembly train --Ermell 05:38, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Gower 05:47, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Dev Jadiya 05:58, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The City Palace in Fulda --Ermell 05:38, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Gower 05:47, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Dev Jadiya 05:58, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The City Palace in Fulda --Ermell 05:38, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 06:21, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Interior of the parish church in Fulda --Ermell 05:38, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality, but could be a bit brighter with more contrast. Could be a FP candidate then. --Uoaei1 06:21, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Kautenbach in Germany-RP, catholic church: Filialkirche Sankt Maria Himmelfahrt --Michielverbeek 05:15, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Ermell 05:39, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Traben-Trarbach in Germany-RP, the townhall --Michielverbeek 05:15, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Discussion
     Oppose Blurr --Dev Jadiya 05:58, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good enough for me --Jakubhal 06:35, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Ok for me --Uoaei1 07:42, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Traben Trarbach in Germnay-RP, town gate: the Brückentor --Michielverbeek 05:15, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Discussion
     Support Good quality. --Ermell 05:48, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
     Oppose not sharp enough --Dev Jadiya 05:58, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Ok for me --Uoaei1 07:42, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Traben-Trarbach in Germany-RP, view to Traben from the bridge (Moselbrücke) --Michielverbeek 05:15, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Withdrawn
     Support Good quality. --Ermell 05:48, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
     Oppose Looks blur sorry --Dev Jadiya 05:58, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
     Oppose Sorry, but I have to agree. Not sharp enough --Jakubhal 06:40, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Traben-Trarbach in Germany-RP, monumental house (the Spitzhaus) with churchtower --Michielverbeek 05:15, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Discussion
     Oppose Overprocessed --Dev Jadiya 05:58, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support QI for me. --Uoaei1 06:25, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Right valve of a fossil Venus Clam, Pitar parisiensis --Llez 05:09, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 05:11, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Detail of the fence of the the Western Forecourt, Ludwigsburg Palace --Llez 05:09, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 05:11, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 05:11, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Upper part gate of the entrance to the Western Forecourt with the monogram F(riedericus) R(ex) of Frederick I of Württemberg, Ludwigsburg Palace, Germany --Llez 05:09, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 05:11, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Porcini mushroom (Boletus edulis), juvenile stage --Syntaxys 05:03, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 05:07, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Boletus edulis is an edible mushroom in the Basidiomycete phylum. By User:Bernie Kohl --Syntaxys 05:03, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 05:07, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Hacker-Festzelt, Oktoberfest --Kallerna 04:49, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. But what about personality rights? --Uoaei1 05:11, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Rio de le Do Torre seen from Ponte Bernando --Kallerna 04:49, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Syntaxys 05:06, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination San Michele Arcangelo church, Quarto d'Altino --Kallerna 04:49, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Ermell 05:34, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Poplar fields near Casale sul Sile --Kallerna 04:49, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Discussion
     Support Good quality. --Gower 05:48, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Ermell 05:50, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
     Oppose Blur --Dev Jadiya 05:58, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Porta San Tomaso --Kallerna 04:49, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Llez 05:14, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination 2025, Kraków, Cmentarz Rakowicki --Igor123121 04:22, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 04:50, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: 2025, Kraków, Bazylika Bożego Ciała w Krakowie --Igor123121 04:22, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review Good quality --Michielverbeek 05:22, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
    Tilted wall surface, asymmetrical composition doesn't fit to expose main theme: portal --Gower 05:52, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: 2025 Poznań, Okrąglak w Poznaniu --Igor123121 04:22, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review Good quality. --Llez 05:13, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
    Crooked a bit, correctio needed. --Gower 05:52, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: 2025 Poznań, Kościół św. Franciszka Serafickiego w Poznaniu --Igor123121 04:22, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    There is something wrong with the cloud on the right --Uoaei1 05:18, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
    @Uoaei1:  Done --Igor123121 05:35, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
    Whatever you have done, this has negative impact on the adjacent building --Uoaei1 06:31, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination 2025 Przemyśl, Kościół św. Antoniego Padewskiego w Przemyślu --Igor123121 04:22, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality, but can you clone out the disturbing traffic light? --Uoaei1 04:50, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Triumphal Arch of Orange (southeast view) --Uoaei1 04:09, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:13, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Entombment of Christ − Fresco in the parish church Zwickenberg, municipality of Oberdrauburg, Carinthia, Austria. Anonymous master, 15th century. --Uoaei1 04:09, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:11, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Parish church Zwickenberg, municipality of Oberdrauburg, Carinthia, Austria --Uoaei1 04:09, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 05:10, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Remote view from the Kobesser estate to Hochosterwitz Castle, municipality of Sankt Georgen am Längsee, Carinthia, Austria --Uoaei1 04:09, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 05:10, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Jesus Christ with the Stigmata at the winged altar of the Church of the Holy Blood in Pulkau, Lower Austria --Uoaei1 04:09, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:10, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Trail from Andiast to Breil-Brigels. Bad weather in the Breil-Brigels region, but it has now dried up.
    --Famberhorst 04:09, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Llez 05:10, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Aekingerzand
  • Promotion Aekingerzand]] Drents-Friese Wold National Park. Dead Birch (Betula) fallen in a heathland pond.
    --Agnes Monkelbaan 04:01, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:07, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Syntaxys 05:06, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Cargo ship SPES-VERA ENI 02325284-MMSI 244660139. Location Groote Brekken. Princess Margriet Canal near the lock complex to the IJsselmeer.
    --Agnes Monkelbaan 04:01, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:08, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Saint Burchard church in Pusselsheim --Plozessor 03:53, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 03:58, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --XRay 03:59, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Wayside cross in Schnackenwerth --Plozessor 03:53, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 03:58, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --XRay 03:59, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Defensive wall with embrasures, late medieval; north of the Catholic parish church of the Assumption in Stettfeld --Plozessor 03:53, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 03:58, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --XRay 03:59, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination 1527 stone cross northwest of Humprechtshausen --Plozessor 03:53, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 03:59, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Inscription plaque with pediment for Prince-Bishop Julius Echter von Mespelbrunn, sandstone, around 1600; in the entrance area of the Haßberge District Office (former tithe barn) in Haßfurt --Plozessor 03:53, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 03:59, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Main Gate of Hiroshima Castle --Jakubhal 03:50, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Plozessor 03:54, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Main Gate of Hiroshima Castle --Jakubhal 03:50, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Plozessor 03:54, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Syntaxys 05:06, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination View from Hiroshima Castle Keep Tower --Jakubhal 03:50, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. Only acceptable sharpness. --XRay 04:01, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Sunset on the beach, Norderney, Lower Saxony, Germany --XRay 03:49, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 03:51, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Sign in the Lower Saxony Wadden Sea National Park, Norderney, Lower Saxony, Germany --XRay 03:49, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 03:52, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Promenade (corner at Moltkestraße; heading east), Norderney, Lower Saxony, Germany (FYI: Already FP) --XRay 03:49, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:04, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Shells on the beach, Norderney, Lower Saxony, Germany --XRay 03:49, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Swimming area marking (with red and yellow flag as swimming zone boundary) on West Beach, Norderney, Lower Saxony, Germany --XRay 03:49, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:06, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Syntaxys 05:06, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Miss Louisiana 2025 Gabrelle McLeod at Madison High School in Tallulah, Louisiana. --Ktkvtsh 02:32, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Discussion
    Could you mind adding the personality attribution --Dev Jadiya 05:58, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
     Oppose Weak details on the face (after denoising), still some noise on the blue dress. Tilted and cluttered background --Jakubhal 06:43, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Bova Marina - Torre D'Avalos (by ThorndykeRC) --undefined 01:14, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 03:54, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Plozessor 03:56, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination View of the Kullu Valley north of the resort town of Manali in Himachal Pradesh, India. By User:Gangulybiswarup --UnpetitproleX 00:15, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Plozessor 03:54, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 03:55, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination 10 Wandy Street in Kłodzko --Jacek Halicki 00:12, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Plozessor 03:55, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 03:57, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination 7 Wandy Street in Kłodzko --Jacek Halicki 00:12, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 04:10, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Franciscan monastery complex in Kłodzko --Jacek Halicki 00:12, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 04:10, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Kłodzko Fortress 1 --Jacek Halicki 00:12, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 03:57, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Kłodzko Fortress 2 --Jacek Halicki 00:12, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Plozessor 03:55, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 03:57, 9 October 2025 (UTC)

October 8, 2025

• 
  • Nomination: Krombach (Lower Franconia), Schulberg 10, War Memorial --KaiBorgeest 21:46, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Too much empty space at the top and on the right IMO --Lmbuga 23:06, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Holy Gate of the Alexandrovsky Monastery, Suzdal --Vsatinet 21:22, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 23:04, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Residential house, Suzdal --Vsatinet 21:22, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Ktkvtsh 02:32, 9 October 2025 (UTC)  Support Nice, like dača in winter. --PetarM 08:49, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Property mark on Rúa do Franco. Santiago de Compostela, Galicia (Spain).--Lmbuga 20:46, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 04:11, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Genesis GV60 at Automesse Ludwigsburg 2025 --Alexander-93 17:55, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Blur --Dev Jadiya 05:58, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Kia Sportage (NQ5) at Automesse Ludwigsburg 2025 --Alexander-93 17:55, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Bijay Chaurasia 18:48, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Beacon at the entrance to the harbour of Nikiti --Kritzolina 17:50, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Not sharp enough --Dev Jadiya 05:58, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Soccer goal at the beach boulevard of Toroni --Kritzolina 17:50, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Discussion
     Support Good quality. --Vsatinet 08:02, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
     Oppose Lacks sharpness. Sorry. --Ermell 09:06, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination View along the street Camino el Bebedero in Icod de los Vinos, Tenerife, Spain, leading to the abandoned wash house in the West --FlocciNivis 17:37, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Юрий Д.К. 20:07, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: View along the Hotel Añaza in Acorán, Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain --FlocciNivis 17:37, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Interesting motif and subject, but the horizon is not horizontal. Please, check also the verticality after having rotated the image. --Harlock81 19:19, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination View up a courtyard between the buildings of the Dr.-Ignaz-Seipel-Platz 3 and the Wollzeile 25 in Vienna, Austria --FlocciNivis 17:37, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Seeing her makes me feel a bit dizzy, but good quality. --Lmbuga 20:51, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Honey Bee (Apis mellifera) on Hawthorn in the Langwieder Heide --FlocciNivis 17:37, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Юрий Д.К. 20:07, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination View to the Bunker Fridolin --FlocciNivis 17:37, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Юрий Д.К. 20:13, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Kalyan Minaret, Bukhara, Uzbekistan --PetarM 17:19, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 17:39, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Dried platanus leaves on rain puddle, Quinta das Conchas e dos Lilases, Lisbon, Portugal (by Julesvernex2) --Sebring12Hrs 16:45, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Soft and good quality. --Terragio67 19:52, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Puddle reflection, Jardim Garcia de Orta, Parque das Nações, Lisbon, Portugal (by Julesvernex2) --Sebring12Hrs 16:45, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Bijay Chaurasia 18:48, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Gabriel at Gulbenkian Park, Lisbon, Portugal (by Julesvernex2) --Sebring12Hrs 16:45, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 20:54, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Bamboo, Calouste Gulbenkian Garden, Lisbon, Portugal (by Julesvernex2) --Sebring12Hrs 16:45, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 17:39, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Lince Ibérico de Bordallo II (2019), Parque das Nações, Lisbon, Portugal (by Julesvernex2) --Sebring12Hrs 16:45, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Bijay Chaurasia 18:48, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Department of Transport Management, Nepal after Genz Protest --Bijay Chaurasia 16:32, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Demonstrations and protests in Nepal in 2025 --Bijay Chaurasia 16:32, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: XPeng G6 (2025) at IAA 2025 --Alexander-93 16:19, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Lincoln Aviator (U611) at IAA 2025 --Alexander-93 16:19, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Bijay Chaurasia 16:36, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Togg T10X at IAA 2025 --Alexander-93 16:19, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Lindley canal in Łódź, Poland by Marian Naworski --Gower 15:39, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Impressive. --Harmonide 16:25, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Syntaxys 05:06, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination 1974 Isuzu Gemini LT --TTTNIS 13:50, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Alexander-93 16:22, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Gower 16:23, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination 1964 Isuzu Bellel Diesel Special Deluxe --TTTNIS 13:50, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Harmonide 16:40, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination 1972 Chevrolet LUV --TTTNIS 13:50, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Bijay Chaurasia 16:36, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Harmonide 16:40, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Rear view of 1972 Chevrolet LUV --TTTNIS 13:50, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Alexander-93 16:22, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Harmonide 16:40, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination 1982 Isuzu Rodeo Bighorn --TTTNIS 13:50, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Harmonide 16:40, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination 3 Chełmońskiego Street in Kłodzko by User:Jacek Halicki--Boston9 13:37, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --MB-one 14:26, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Gower 16:23, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Harmonide 16:40, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination 4 Chełmońskiego Street in Kłodzko by User:Jacek Halicki--Boston9 13:37, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality --Michielverbeek 15:29, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Gower 16:23, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination 4a Stryjeńskiej Street in Kłodzko 1 by User:Jacek Halicki--Boston9 13:37, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Alexander-93 16:22, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Gower 16:23, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination 4a Stryjeńskiej Street in Kłodzko 2 by User:Jacek Halicki--Boston9 13:37, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Gower 16:23, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination 4a Stryjeńskiej Street in Kłodzko 3 by User:Jacek Halicki--Boston9 13:37, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Gower 16:23, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination 20225, Kraków, Cmentarz Rakowicki w Krakowie --Igor123121 13:36, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support There's something special about this one. Good job. --Harmonide 16:40, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination 20225, Kraków, Cmentarz Rakowicki w Krakowie --Igor123121 13:36, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Harmonide 16:40, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination 2025, Kraków, Park Strzelecki w Krakowie, 21 --Igor123121 13:36, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Gower 16:23, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Could you center a bit more the subject, though? --Harmonide 16:40, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination 20225, Kraków, Cmentarz Rakowicki w Krakowie --Igor123121 13:36, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality --Michielverbeek 15:32, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Harmonide 16:25, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination 20225, Kraków, Cmentarz Rakowicki w Krakowie --Igor123121 13:36, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
    Nice but needs little perspective correction. --Gower 16:23, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Harmonide 16:25, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Bust of Charikléia Daskalaki, Cretan heroic figure against the Turkish assault of the Arkadi Monastery in 1866 --Harmonide 13:05, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline
    Blown out highlights --Gower 13:58, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
    Just a comment, so I'm formatting it as a comment again. @Gower: , pay attention pls. --Lvova 14:54, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
     Oppose There is another problem with the picture. The detail is not good because it is a bit blurred (I can't quite see it in focus) and there are artefacts (see eyes, nose or lips). The top left is blown out. --Lmbuga 21:05, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Islamic ornaments and window, Sher-Dor Madrasa, Samarkand --PetarM 11:57, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --AFBorchert 12:38, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Harmonide 12:53, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Stained glass window of Cathédrale Notre-Dame d'Évreux, Normandie --AFBorchert 10:58, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Harmonide 12:53, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Stained glass window of Cathédrale Notre-Dame d'Évreux, Normandie --AFBorchert 10:58, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Harmonide 12:53, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination First Town Hospital, Belgrade, Serbia --PetarM 10:25, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support I like this perspective. --Harmonide 12:53, 8 October 2025)
• 
  • Nomination Zoeller Micro XL waste collection truck on Fuso eCanter chassis at Nufam 2025 in Rheinstetten --MB-one 10:24, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Instructive sight. --Harmonide 13:13, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Mercedes-Benz CLK DTM at Techno-Classica 2024, Essen --MB-one 10:24, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Harmonide 16:40, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Kia Proceed Concept at IAA 2017 --MB-one 10:24, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Harmonide 12:53, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Manhole cover near the observation deck at Eptapyrgiou street. --Красный 09:31, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --MB-one 11:09, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Harmonide 12:53, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Wojciech Pędzich. Second day of Wikimedia CEE Meeting 2025. --Красный 08:59, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion QI. --PetarM 10:38, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality, although the chairs in the foreground are a little annoying --MB-one 11:09, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Grzegorz Kopaczewski. Second day of Wikimedia CEE Meeting 2025. --Красный 08:59, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Harmonide 13:13, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Zafer Batik. Second day of Wikimedia CEE Meeting 2025. --Красный 08:59, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Gives an atmosphere. --Harmonide 13:35, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Abandoned baths in Loutra Volvis --Lvova 08:25, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --MB-one 11:16, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Harmonide 13:13, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Asvestochori --Lvova 08:25, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Igor123121 15:56, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Gower 16:23, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Asvestochori --Lvova 08:25, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Igor123121 15:56, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
    Technically correct, but rather dull light and uninteresting composition (too much road) --Gower 16:23, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
    The script is not very comfortable to leave a comment without changing the status, I know, so I returned Promotion; if you think, that it should not be promoted - it is Decline -> Discuss. In this case, this composition highlights the unevenness of the city's landscape, making it worthwhile to leave this fragment in place. The goal isn't to make this more "interesting". Lvova 16:46, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Stivos --Lvova 08:25, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Igor123121 15:56, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. Nicely composed. --Gower 16:23, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Northern rose window in Cathédrale Notre-Dame d'Évreux. --AFBorchert 08:11, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 10:02, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Benjism89 10:05, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Stained glass window from 1520 with panels of the 13th century in Cathédrale Notre-Dame d'Évreux, Normandie --AFBorchert 08:11, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 10:02, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Benjism89 10:05, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Harmonide 13:35, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Landscape in Tarangire National Park, Tanzania --Poco a poco 07:57, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Benjism89 10:08, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Hippopotamus (Hippopotamus amphibius), Serengeti National Park, Tanzania --Poco a poco 07:57, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Bijay Chaurasia 08:16, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Excellent. --Harmonide 13:13, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Hippopotamus (Hippopotamus amphibius), Serengeti National Park, Tanzania --Poco a poco 07:57, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Benjism89 10:08, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Candelabra tree (Euphorbia ingens), Tarangire National Park, Tanzania --Poco a poco 07:57, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --AFBorchert 08:15, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Harmonide 13:13, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination 2025, Kraków, Park Strzelecki w Krakowie, 11 --Igor123121 06:57, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:04, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Harmonide 13:13, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination 2025, pl. Mariacki 3 Kraków, Kamienica Hipolitów, 1 --Igor123121 06:57, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 10:03, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
    Composition could be better (crop moved to the left to balance those two windows) --Gower 13:58, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
    @Gower: It could always be better, but in its current state, in my opinion, the photo deserves QI. I don’t want to shift it in software because it wouldn’t look natural. --Igor123121 14:38, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
    So it was Promotion, then Gower changed it to Discuss, then Igor123121 changed it to Nomination. Well, I am not sure about the intention of Gower (if he wanted to say oppose, this should be discussed, but today and yesterday he put several comments as discussions), so I put 'promotion' here, and if Gower is against - white us that you are, please, and hey everyone, let's try to be understandable for each other :) Lvova 15:27, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Lanius excubitor (Great Grey Shrike) in Bhigwan, Maharashtra, India. --Tisha Mukherjee 06:50, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Igor123121 06:57, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Lovely. --Harmonide 12:53, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Lanius excubitor (Great Grey Shrike) in Bhigwan, Maharashtra, India. --Tisha Mukherjee 06:50, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Igor123121 06:57, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Really good. --Harmonide 12:53, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Alauda gulgula (Oriental Skylark) in Bakkhali, West Bengal, India. --Tisha Mukherjee 06:50, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Igor123121 06:57, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Harmonide 12:53, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Pluvialis fulva (Pacific Golden-Plover) in Bakkhali, West Bengal, India. --Tisha Mukherjee 06:50, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Igor123121 06:57, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Harmonide 12:53, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Pluvialis fulva (Pacific Golden-Plover) in Bakkhali, West Bengal, India. --Tisha Mukherjee 06:50, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Igor123121 06:57, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Harmonide 12:53, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Meursault (Côte-d'Or, France) - Sign at the entrance of Château de Meursault, one of the most famous vineyards in Burgundy --Benjism89 06:22, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 06:28, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Meursault (Côte-d'Or, France) - Charles Giraud street, entering the center from Southeast --Benjism89 06:22, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 06:28, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Meursault (Côte-d'Or, France) - Château of Cîteaux, now a hotel and restaurant --Benjism89 06:22, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 06:28, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Harmonide 13:40, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Meursault (Côte-d'Or, France) - Saint Nicholas church - Church tower --Benjism89 06:22, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 06:28, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Nice. --Harmonide 13:13, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Meursault (Côte-d'Or, France) - Saint Nicholas church --Benjism89 06:22, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 06:28, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Harmonide 13:40, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Sviyazhskaya Makaryevskaya Pustyn Bell Tower --Mike1979 Russia 05:49, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Tisha Mukherjee 06:44, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Harmonide 13:40, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Raifsky Bogoroditsky Monastery early XX century Monk Building --Mike1979 Russia 05:49, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Discussion
     Oppose Another perspective would work better, don't you think? --Harmonide 13:40, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
    I don't think so. What kind of perspective exactly? --Mike1979 Russia 17:17, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support QI for me. @Harmonide: I see no QI rule that covers your vote. --Uoaei1 05:24, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Raifsky Bogoroditsky Monastery Saints of Sinay and Raifa Refectory Church --Mike1979 Russia 05:49, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Tisha Mukherjee 06:44, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Harmonide 13:40, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Kazan Ascension Monastery Resurrection Church --Mike1979 Russia 05:49, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Tisha Mukherjee 06:44, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Harmonide 13:40, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination War memorial in front of St. Mary's Church in Poppenhausen in Heldburg --Ermell 05:41, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Tisha Mukherjee 06:44, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Door of of St. Mary's Church in Poppenhausen in Heldburg --Ermell 05:41, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support It is minimally tilted to the right. But still in tolerance to be assessed to be of good quality. --AFBorchert 08:22, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Altar and pulpit in St. Mary's Church in Poppenhausen in Heldburg --Ermell 05:41, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 06:10, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Facade of St. Mary's Church in Poppenhausen in Heldburg --Ermell 05:41, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 06:10, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination St. Mary's Church in Poppenhausen in Heldburg --Ermell 05:41, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 06:10, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Harmonide 12:53, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Thalfang in Germany-RP, catholic church: Pfarrkirche Sankt Matthäus --Michielverbeek 05:28, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --AFBorchert 08:25, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Morbach in Germany-RP, sculpture in the Birkenfelder Strasse --Michielverbeek 05:28, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 06:11, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Morbach in Germany-RP, catholic church: Pfarrkirche Sankt Anna --Michielverbeek 05:29, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Perspective correction needed, tower is a bit tilted. --Gower 16:23, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Gonzerath in Germany-RP, catholic church: Pfarrkirche Sankt Antonius und Sankt Valerius --Michielverbeek 05:28, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 06:11, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Harmonide 12:53, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Left valve of a fossil Venus clam, Meroena separata --Llez 05:18, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 05:20, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Harmonide 12:53, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Upper part of the right gate pillar of the entrance to the Western Forecourt, Ludwigsburg Palace, Germany --Llez 05:18, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 05:19, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Harmonide 12:53, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Upper part of the left gate pillar of the entrance to the Western Forecourt, Ludwigsburg Palace, Germany --Llez 05:18, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 05:19, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Harmonide 12:53, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Saint Erasmus at the winged altar of the parish church Zwickenberg, municipality of Oberdrauburg, Carinthia, Austria --Uoaei1 04:50, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Ermell 05:56, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Harmonide 12:53, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Saint Christopher at the winged altar of the parish church Zwickenberg, municipality of Oberdrauburg, Carinthia, Austria --Uoaei1 04:50, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Llez 05:21, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Legend of Saint Leonard: The saint celebrates mass − Fresco at the southern exterior wall of the parish church Zwickenberg, municipality of Oberdrauburg, Carinthia, Austria --Uoaei1 04:50, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Llez 05:21, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Organ of Herzogenburg Monastery church, Lower Austria --Uoaei1 04:50, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Llez 05:21, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Detail of a fishing boat in the harbour, Greetsiel, Krummhörn, Lower Saxony, Germany --XRay 04:22, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:37, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Shells on the beach, Norderney, Lower Saxony, Germany --XRay 04:22, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:38, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Groyne at Dovetief, Norderney, Lower Saxony, Germany --XRay 04:22, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Ermell 05:36, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Dune landscape (with lighthouse) at Zuckerpad in the Lower Saxony Wadden Sea National Park (buffer zone), Norderney, Lower Saxony, Germany --XRay 04:22, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:39, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Devotee in Lord Shiva's pose --I.Mahesh 04:16, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Needs categories. --Ermell 05:36, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
    {{Personality rights}} needs to be added. And please add a more elaborate description: Where in India have these portraits been taken? --AFBorchert 11:04, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Sri vari swarana radham at Tirupati --I.Mahesh 04:16, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Appears to be tilted. Could you please fix this? --AFBorchert 11:05, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
    I love this one. But isn't it a bit tilted? --Harmonide 16:40, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Trail from Andiast to Breil-Brigels. Bad weather in the Breil-Brigels region, with rain expected.<br--Famberhorst 04:14, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 04:23, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Harmonide 16:40, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Bolsward. St. Martin’s Church. Side Entrance of the church.
    --Agnes Monkelbaan 04:07, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 04:23, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Aekingerzand Drents-Friese Wold National Park. View of the “living” sand drift.
    --Agnes Monkelbaan 04:07, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 04:23, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination View from Klimczok peak in the Silesian Beskids --Jakubhal 03:49, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:08, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Harmonide 16:40, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Hiking trail in the Klimczok and Szyndzielnia Range in the Silesian Beskids --Jakubhal 03:49, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:15, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Hiking trail on Klimczok Mountain in the Silesian Beskids --Jakubhal 03:49, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:16, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Painted stone exchange point by the trail to Klimczok in Szczyrk (Silesian Beskids), related to the social media activity #kamienie #szczyrk --Jakubhal 03:49, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:09, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Interesting and sweet. --Harmonide 12:40, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Wayside shrine on the slope of Klimczok in the Silesian Beskids --Jakubhal 03:49, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:11, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Red-legged seriema in Parque Estadual Encontro das Águas, Brazil --Giles Laurent 03:40, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 03:50, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Great!! --Harmonide 12:40, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Pink Ipê tree in Parque Estadual Encontro das Águas, Brazil --Giles Laurent 03:40, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 03:50, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Waw. --Harmonide 12:40, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Shiny cowbird in a Pink Ipê tree in Parque Estadual Encontro das Águas --Giles Laurent 03:40, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:12, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Harmonide 12:40, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Chestnut-bellied guan in Parque Estadual Encontro das Águas, Brazil --Giles Laurent 03:40, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 03:50, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Excellent. --Harmonide 12:40, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Green ibis in Parque Estadual Encontro das Águas, Brazil --Giles Laurent 03:40, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 03:50, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Yes! --Harmonide 11:34, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Northern outbuilding of Bramberg castle ruin --Plozessor 03:32, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:18, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Parish church in Augsfeld --Plozessor 03:32, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Giles Laurent 03:43, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Gower 16:23, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Conciliation cross in the Michelsgrund near Münnerstadt --Plozessor 03:32, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Giles Laurent 03:43, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Conciliation cross in the Michelsgrund near Münnerstadt --Plozessor 03:32, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 03:51, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Harmonide 16:43, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Statue of Moses at St. Mary's church in Königsberg in Bayern --Plozessor 03:32, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 04:51, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Door of the Pazo de Fondevila, Santiago de Compostela, Galicia (Spain). --Lmbuga 03:06, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Giles Laurent 03:42, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Harmonide 16:40, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Windows of the Pazo de Fondevila, Santiago de Compostela, Galicia (Spain). --Lmbuga 03:06, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Giles Laurent 03:42, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Sign at the Chapel of Souls in Santiago de Compostela, Galicia. --Lmbuga 03:06, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Giles Laurent 03:42, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Harmonide 16:43, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Sculpture on the portal of the College of Saint Jerome. Santiago de Compostela, Galicia (Spain). --Lmbuga 03:06, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 03:20, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Harmonide 16:43, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Thajiwas Park, a popular tourist site in the resort town of Sonamarg, in the Himalayas of the northern Indian state of Jammu and Kashmir. by User:Gannu03 --UnpetitproleX 02:13, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 02:19, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Statue of Jesus on the cross. --Rjcastillo 02:11, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:20, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Harmonide 16:43, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Carabobo Street, Maracaibo --Rjcastillo 02:11, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Plozessor 03:40, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Harmonide 16:43, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Santa Teresita Church, Maracaibo. --Rjcastillo 02:11, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 03:15, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Mural in Maracaibo. --Rjcastillo 02:11, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Plozessor 03:40, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good! --Harmonide 11:34, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The Rayo Soccer School --Rjcastillo 02:11, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 03:11, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Replica of Athena Giustiniani statue (rear view), Lower Gardens of Peterhof, Saint Petersburg, Russia. --Екатерина Борисова 01:44, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 03:08, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Bottom part of Labyrinth fountain with rainbow, Lower Gardens of Peterhof, Saint Petersburg, Russia. --Екатерина Борисова 01:44, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 03:52, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Orangery Garden with Triton fountain in Lower Park of Peterhof, Saint Petersburg, Russia. --Екатерина Борисова 01:44, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Plozessor 03:39, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Harmonide 12:37, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Hydrangea in Orangery Garden of Lower Park, Peterhof, Saint Petersburg, Russia. --Екатерина Борисова 01:44, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Юрий Д.К. 02:59, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Pink Hibiscus in Orangery Garden of Lower Park, Peterhof, Saint Petersburg, Russia. --Екатерина Борисова 01:44, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 01:52, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Kłodzka Szkoła Przedsiębiorczości 1 --Jacek Halicki 00:03, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 01:51, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Kłodzka Szkoła Przedsiębiorczości 2 --Jacek Halicki 00:03, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. But this is the historic centre? --Uoaei1 04:53, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination 2-4 Chełmońskiego Street in Kłodzko --Jacek Halicki 00:03, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 03:52, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination 2 Chełmońskiego Street in Kłodzko --Jacek Halicki 00:03, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Plozessor 03:39, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination 3 Chełmońskiego Street in Kłodzko --Jacek Halicki 00:03, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 03:52, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

October 7, 2025

• 
  • Nomination: 2025, Kraków, Ratusz dawnej jurydyki Garbary, Ulica Karmelicka 12 (1) --Igor123121 16:23, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    not very favorable composition and framing, it's a pity that the entire façade was not included --Gower 18:40, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
    @Gower: Thank you for your comment, but I don’t really understand how I should respond to it. True, the composition may not be the most favorable, but I am waiting for a vote for or against. We shouldn’t dwell on the past, for example that a photo of the whole building wasn’t taken, etc. I would also like to remind you that when commenting on multiple photos, you don’t need to redirect each one to the discussion; you can also use the comment function. --Igor123121 18:48, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
    Returned to Nomination section. Please, use Comment if you have a comment. Lvova 09:09, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination 2025, Kraków, Ulica Mikołajska 14 (7) --Igor123121 16:23, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline
    A bit random cropped. --Gower 18:40, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
    @Gower: Thank you for your comment, but I don’t really understand what I’m supposed to do. In any case, the quality is very good. --Igor123121 18:49, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
    Returned to Nomination section. Please, use Comment if you have a comment. Lvova 09:07, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
     Oppose Sorry but the composition is very unfortunate. The street lamp on the left is cropped in half, three of four windows are cropped. --AFBorchert 11:09, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
     Oppose Agree with the above criticism. --Harmonide 12:37, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Human Rights Trail plaque. Salvador Parga Square. Santiago de Compostela. Galicia (Spain). --Lmbuga 23:44, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
    I found pictures of this plaque on the Internet, and in them the upper part is round, while in your photo it is elongated (maybe because of PC). Can you fix this issue, please? --Екатерина Борисова 01:53, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
     Comment You're right. I will endeavour to improve it. --Lmbuga 02:23, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
     Done When I made the correction, the image size decreased significantly, but I think it looks better.--Lmbuga 02:37, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Harmonide 12:37, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Sports school 3 in Yefremov --Юрий Д.К. 22:47, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
    In my opinion, it needs a very slight perspective correction. The picture is really good. --Lmbuga 23:36, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 09:55, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Sports school 3 in Yefremov --Юрий Д.К. 22:47, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
    The quality of the picture is unquestionable, but the vertical line of the building on its left side is tilted. If you tell me that the building is like that, I will promote it. --Lmbuga 23:29, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
    Hi, both images will be fixed --Юрий Д.К. 03:00, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 09:55, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination LiAZ-6213 in Moscow --Юрий Д.К. 22:47, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 23:29, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Moscow - 2025 - Colonnade of Big Theatre --Юрий Д.К. 22:47, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 23:29, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good geometry. --Harmonide 12:37, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Moscow - 2025 - City Sightseeing boat --Юрий Д.К. 22:47, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 23:29, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Harmonide 12:37, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Bouvigne Castle, Breda --ReneeWrites 22:30, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 22:41, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Nice shot. --Harmonide 12:37, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination "The Lightning Bolt", a Z-shaped lookout tower near Breda --ReneeWrites 22:30, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 23:19, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Harmonide 12:37, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination "The Lightning Bolt", a Z-shaped lookout tower near Breda --ReneeWrites 22:30, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 23:18, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Harmonide 12:37, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination "The Lightning Bolt", a Z-shaped lookout tower near Breda --ReneeWrites 22:30, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 23:18, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Harmonide 12:37, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination "The Lightning Bolt", a Z-shaped lookout tower near Breda --ReneeWrites 22:30, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 23:18, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Clustered brittlestem (Psathyrella piluliformis) -- George Chernilevsky 21:06, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 23:14, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Love this one. --Harmonide 11:34, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Church of the Resurrection of Christ, Suzdal --Vsatinet 20:48, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Tisha Mukherjee 06:44, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Church of the Resurrection of Christ, Suzdal --Vsatinet 20:48, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Tisha Mukherjee 06:44, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Harmonide 11:34, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Parietaria officinalis commonly called Vetriola. --Anna.Massini 20:21, 7 October 2025 (UTC)Anna.Massini
  • Promotion
     Support Good for observation. --Harmonide 12:37, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Marios Magioladitis. Second day of Wikimedia CEE Meeting 2025. --Красный 19:30, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline
    White balance --Lmbuga 00:09, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
     Oppose Quite good quality, but unfavorable perspective. --Gower 13:58, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Eva Martin. Second day of Wikimedia CEE Meeting 2025. --Красный 19:30, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Not well balanced: too much wasted space at the top. Somewhat blurred. It would be nice to see the whole hands. Noise and chromatic noise in the hair or clothing. --Lmbuga 00:06, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Vitaly Zdanevich. Second day of Wikimedia CEE Meeting 2025. --Красный 19:30, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose High noise, not too sharp --Gower 20:16, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Mohammad (Darafsh). Second day of Wikimedia CEE Meeting 2025. --Красный 19:30, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Zolfeqor Fatihzadeh. Second day of Wikimedia CEE Meeting 2025. --Красный 19:30, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline
    Focus is on beard, not on eyes. --Gower 13:58, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
    Just a comment, so I'm formatting it as a comment again. @Gower: , pay attention pls. --Lvova 14:54, 8 October 2025 (UTC)  Oppose Agree with @Gower: . Focus point problem. --PetarM 08:53, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Eyes of the WildI, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license: --A S M Jobaer 18:42, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Vignetting, posterization... --Sebring12Hrs 19:10, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Eyes of the WildI, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license: --A S M Jobaer 18:42, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Vignetting, bad sharpness, blurred.... --Sebring12Hrs 19:10, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
     Oppose Too dark. We don't see much. --Harmonide 11:34, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination A close-up artistic photograph of a perfume bottle covered in water droplets, illuminated by dramatic red and dark lighting.I, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license:This media has been uploaded as a part of Project Korikath --A S M Jobaer 18:32, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose CAs, lack of sharpness... --Sebring12Hrs 19:10, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
     Oppose So dark! What's the point? --Harmonide 11:34, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Aqua Pour Homme Eau de Toilette is a fresh, masculine fragrance designed with a sleek and modern aesthetic.I, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license:This media has been uploaded as a part of Project Korikath --A S M Jobaer 18:32, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Writtings are blurred. --Sebring12Hrs 19:15, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
     Oppose A bit too dark. --Harmonide 12:37, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination detail of Sher-Dor Madrasa, Samarkand --PetarM 18:25, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Gower 20:16, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Waw. --Harmonide 11:34, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Arabic calligraphy from Essaouira --User:Mounir Neddi 19:03, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Nice but not sharp enough --Gower 20:16, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
     Oppose Indeed. --Harmonide 11:34, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Ceiling & Calligraphy of Bibi-Khanym Mausoleum, Samarkand --PetarM 17:31, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Gower 17:46, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Wonderful. Thank you for this contribution! --Harmonide 11:34, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Karmi is a village in Kapkot block of Bageshwar district in Uttarakhand. By User:Harshit SR --UnpetitproleX 17:13, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Gower 17:46, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Wow. --Harmonide 12:37, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Surviving fragment of an altar with reliefs of the apostles, 15th or 16th century, Saint-Brice de Beuzeville-au-Plain, Normandie. --AFBorchert 16:49, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Gower 17:46, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Harmonide 11:34, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination MG Cyberster at autoMOBIL Tübingen 2025 --Alexander-93 16:44, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Gower 17:46, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --A S M Jobaer 18:33, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Harmonide 11:34, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Volvo XC60 (SPA) at autoMOBIL Tübingen 2025 --Alexander-93 16:44, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Gower 17:46, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Surviving panel of a 15th-century stained glass window in Saint-Brice de Beuzeville-au-Plain, Normandie, France --AFBorchert 16:20, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Nice one. Thank you. --Harmonide 12:37, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Leapmotor Lafa 5 at IAA 2025 --Alexander-93 16:15, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --A S M Jobaer 18:33, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: XPeng P7+ at IAA 2025 --Alexander-93 16:15, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    IMHO loss of detail in shadows --Gower 16:23, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Avatr 12 at IAA 2025 --Alexander-93 16:15, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    IMHO loss of detail in shadows --Gower 16:23, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Three Smith's Giant Houseleek inflorescences growing out of rocks in the Jardín del Centro de Visitantes de El Portillo in Los Realejos, Tenerife, Spain --FlocciNivis 15:47, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 16:36, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Oh. --Harmonide 11:34, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination An Alteza supermarket in La Esperanza close to the border to Las Rosas in El Rosario, Tenerife, Spain --FlocciNivis 15:47, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
    Too noisy --Poco a poco 19:19, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
     Done I denoised the image --FlocciNivis 20:33, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Better, just over the bar because of overexposure in the sky and I believe also that the shadows are also a bit too bright, but overall ok --Poco a poco 10:13, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination View from the Mirador por Teide at the TF-82 on the Valle de Arriba at night --FlocciNivis 15:47, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Ok --Poco a poco 19:19, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Interesting! --Harmonide 11:34, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination View from the Mangfall Bridge in Valley-Grub to the West --FlocciNivis 15:47, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 16:37, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Freihafenelbbrücke, part of the northern elbe bridges in Hamburg. --Dirtsc 14:51, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 16:36, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good geometry. --Harmonide 11:34, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Freihafenelbbrücke, part of the northern elbe bridges in Hamburg. --Dirtsc 14:51, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality although an id of the ship on the left would be even better --Poco a poco 19:19, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support OK. --Harmonide 11:34, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Freihafenelbbrücke, part of the northern elbe bridges in Hamburg. --Dirtsc 14:51, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. Very nice. --Gower 18:40, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Harmonide 11:34, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Federal Building, Chatham, Ontario, 2025-07-06 --Crisco 1492 14:30, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --ROCKY 14:43, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Gower 18:40, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Harmonide 11:34, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Fire station, Erieau, Ontario, 2025-07-06 --Crisco 1492 14:30, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 16:14, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Erieau School bell, Erieau, Ontario, 2025-07-06 --Crisco 1492 14:30, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 16:13, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Kent Regiment Memorial, Tecumseh Park, Chatham, Ontario, 2025-07-06 --Crisco 1492 14:30, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --ROCKY 14:43, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Lighthouse (1818), Lighthouse Conservation Area, Tilbury, Ontario, 2025-07-06 --Crisco 1492 14:30, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 16:13, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Gower 18:40, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: The main entrance of Ujjayanta Palace, Agartala, Tripura --Herpking 13:57, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    PC is needed. --Sebring12Hrs 19:12, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Right Facade of Ujjayanta Palace, Agartala, Tripura --Herpking 13:57, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Sorry, composition (seems like a random picture): The stair railings are cut off (File:Right Facade of Ujjayanta Palace, Agartala, Tripura 05.JPG). The photo is not well balanced. It needs perspective correction. --Lmbuga 16:28, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: IndiGo Airbus A320-251N - VT-IXA at Maharaja Bir Bikram Airport (IXA) --Herpking 13:57, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Vigneting, perspective correction needed, too soft --Poco a poco 19:21, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Baneswar Shiva Temple, Baneswar, Cooch Behar, WB --Herpking 13:57, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    I am sorry, in my opinion it is underexposed and needs perspective correction. --Lmbuga 16:22, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
    The building is slightly tilted. Could you please fix this? --AFBorchert 16:23, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Wikimedian Amitabha Gupta near the Falnapur Madan Mohan Temple, Cooch Behar, WB --Herpking 13:57, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 17:09, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Detail of the wayside Cross, San Fiz de Solovio square, Santiago de Compostela, Galicia (Spain). --Lmbuga 12:41, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Crisco 1492 14:34, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Convent of Santa María de Belvís, Santiago de Compostela, Galicia (Spain). --Lmbuga 12:41, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Crisco 1492 14:34, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination House on Rúa da Ensinanza Street, Santiago de Compostela, Galicia (Spain). --Lmbuga 12:41, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Crisco 1492 14:34, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination 14th-century stained glass window in Notre-Dame de La Colombe, Normandie, France. HDR and panorama combined using 28 single shots. --AFBorchert 12:09, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 12:43, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Harmonide 00:04, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Young priests under the age of 16 perform daily rituals, including cleaning and worshiping the reclining Vishnu statue, at the Budhanilkantha Temple in Nepal. --Bijay Chaurasia 10:36, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Crisco 1492 14:34, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Gower 18:40, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support What a mesmerizing picture. Thank you for this valuable contribution. --Harmonide 00:04, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Main entrance of Sansad Bhavan of Nepal (International Convention Centre Nepal) After GenZ Protest8,9 September 2025, --Bijay Chaurasia 10:36, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    A bit noisy. Tilted and needs perspective correction. --Lmbuga 13:03, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
    New file updated with NR and Perspective Correction --Bijay Chaurasia 08:13, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Młynówka in Kłodzko 1 by User:Jacek Halicki--Boston9 10:23, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --AFBorchert 12:10, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 12:48, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Młynówka in Kłodzko 2 by User:Jacek Halicki--Boston9 10:23, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality,l but the building on the right seems a bit leaning --Lmbuga 12:48, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Młynówka in Kłodzko 3 by User:Jacek Halicki--Boston9 10:23, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 12:51, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Młynówka in Kłodzko 4 by User:Jacek Halicki--Boston9 10:23, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. It's beautiful, but it makes me feel dizzy or light-headed. --Lmbuga 12:53, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Młynówka in Kłodzko 5 by User:Jacek Halicki--Boston9 10:23, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 12:56, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Stained glass window dated from 1313 in Saint-Pierre du Mesnil-Villeman, depicting St. Peter and a donor. This is the oldest dated stained glass window that applies siver staining to achieve a yellow color. Combination of HDR and panorama, using 14 individual shots. --AFBorchert 10:08, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 12:56, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good job. --Harmonide 00:04, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Scene from the Navratri festival celebrations in Vidisha, Madhya Pradesh, October 2025 --Dev Jadiya 08:22, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline Processing issues; perspective. --Peulle 09:51, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
     Oppose Bad perspective. --Gower 18:40, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Scene from the Navratri festival celebrations in Vidisha, Madhya Pradesh, October 2025 --Dev Jadiya 08:22, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline Processing problems. --Peulle 09:52, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Scene from the Navratri festival celebrations in Vidisha, Madhya Pradesh, October 2025 --Dev Jadiya 08:22, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline Insufficient quality: strong processing artefacts. --Peulle 09:52, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Scene from the Navratri festival celebrations in Vidisha, Madhya Pradesh, October 2025 --Dev Jadiya 08:22, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline Insufficient quality: processing problems. --Peulle 09:53, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Scene from the Navratri festival celebrations in Vidisha, Madhya Pradesh, October 2025 --Dev Jadiya 08:22, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline Insufficient quality: processing problems. --Peulle 09:53, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Chassis type Chanin for railway freight wagons. --AlixSaz 07:56, 7 October 2025(UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 13:05, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support The quality is good, but please add some category of location. --Екатерина Борисова 02:03, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
    Ok. Added the category and location --AlixSaz 08:19, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Snowy egret in Parque Estadual Encontro das Águas, Brazil --Giles Laurent 07:45, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Tisha Mukherjee 10:49, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Male Snowy egret fighting in Parque Estadual Encontro das Águas, Brazil --Giles Laurent 07:45, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --AFBorchert 10:11, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Female snail kite in Parque Estadual Encontro das Águas, Brazil --Giles Laurent 07:45, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 13:06, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Rufescent Tiger-heron in Parque Estadual Encontro das Águas, Brazil --Giles Laurent 07:45, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 13:20, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Female Campo flicker in Parque Estadual Encontro das Águas, Brazil --Giles Laurent 07:45, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Syntaxys 08:22, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Drinking fountain in Scholari --Lvova 07:10, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Giles Laurent 07:46, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination A waste container in Scholari --Lvova 07:08, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Vsatinet 12:52, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination A view from Leoforos Nikis --Lvova 07:08, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Giles Laurent 07:46, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination A bus stop in Stivos --Lvova 07:08, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. But nothing special --Dev Jadiya 07:40, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
    It should not be, but YOU made your comment VERY special and weird. Lvova 08:09, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Gallicrex cinerea (Watercock) in Bhigwan, Maharashtra, India. --Tisha Mukherjee 07:06, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Dev Jadiya 07:39, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Perfect. --Harmonide 00:04, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Gallicrex cinerea (Watercock) in Bhigwan, Maharashtra, India. --Tisha Mukherjee 07:06, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Giles Laurent 07:47, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Gallicrex cinerea (Watercock) in Bhigwan, Maharashtra, India. --Tisha Mukherjee 07:06, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Giles Laurent 07:47, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Great! --Harmonide 00:04, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Calidris subminuta (Long-toed Stint) in Bakkhali, West Bengal, India. --Tisha Mukherjee 07:06, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Dev Jadiya 07:39, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Very good, and very sweet. --Harmonide 00:04, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Alauda gulgula (Oriental Skylark) in Bakkhali, West Bengal, India. --Tisha Mukherjee 07:06, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Dev Jadiya 07:39, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Weir in Kłodzko --Jacek Halicki 06:23, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 06:29, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Młynówka in Kłodzko 1 --Jacek Halicki 06:23, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 13:24, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Młynówka in Kłodzko 2 --Jacek Halicki 06:23, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Right side leaning in --Poco a poco 06:29, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Młynówka in Kłodzko 3 --Jacek Halicki 06:23, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 13:27, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Młynówka in Kłodzko 4 --Jacek Halicki 06:23, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Slight ccw tilt --Poco a poco 06:29, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Kibandiko Island, Tanzania --Poco a poco 06:18, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality, the compostion though simple feels satisfying to me --FlocciNivis 17:10, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Rock in Serengeti National Park, Tanzania --Poco a poco 06:18, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Dev Jadiya 07:39, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Suni (Nesotragus moschatus), Changuu Island, Tanzania --Poco a poco 06:18, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 06:26, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Hippopotamus (Hippopotamus amphibius), Serengeti National Park, TanzaniaThis image was uploaded as part of Wiki Loves Earth 2024. --Poco a poco 06:18, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 06:26, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Tournus (Saône-et-Loire, France) - Republic street --Benjism89 05:40, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Mike1979 Russia 06:11, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Tournus (Saône-et-Loire, France) - View of Saint Philibert abbey and its neighborhood from Roger Gautheron bridge --Benjism89 05:40, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
    spots in the sky --Mike1979 Russia 06:12, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
    indeed, thanks, I just removed these spots --Benjism89 16:03, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Mike1979 Russia 10:16, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Tournus (Saône-et-Loire, France) - The train station building --Benjism89 05:40, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 06:26, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Tournus (Saône-et-Loire, France) - The train station building and selling machine --Benjism89 05:40, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Mike1979 Russia 06:10, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Meursault (Côte-d'Or, France) - Entrance of Château de Meursault, one of the most famous vineyards in Burgundy --Benjism89 05:40, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 06:26, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Jewish cemetery in Mühlhausen --Ermell 05:23, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 06:27, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Very moving picture. Thank you for taking it. --Harmonide 00:04, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Jewish cemetery in Mühlhausen --Ermell 05:23, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:27, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Jewish cemetery in Mühlhausen --Ermell 05:23, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:27, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support There is something in the composition and the light that makes this one above the others. It conveys more emotion. Like the tumbs were about to talk. Thank you for sharing. --Harmonide 00:04, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Jewish cemetery in Mühlhausen --Ermell 05:23, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:27, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Jewish cemetery in Mühlhausen --Ermell 05:23, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Mike1979 Russia 06:09, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Portal of the Saint Victor and Holy Crown church in Espirat, Puy-de-Dôme, France. --Tournasol7 05:20, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Igor123121 05:25, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Saint Peter in chains church in Moissat-Bas, commune of Moissat, Puy-de-Dôme, France. --Tournasol7 05:20, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 05:22, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Saint Martin church in Varennes-sur-Morge, Puy-de-Dôme, France. --Tournasol7 05:20, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Igor123121 05:25, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Side portal of the Saint Martin church in Cournon-d'Auvergne, Puy-de-Dôme, France. --Tournasol7 05:20, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 05:22, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Saint Louis collegiate church in Castelnau-Bretenoux, commune of Prudhomat, Lot, France. --Tournasol7 05:20, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Igor123121 05:25, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Left valve of a Similar Cardita, Carditamera affinis --Llez 05:15, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Ermell 05:20, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Nice job! --Harmonide 00:04, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Monogram F(riedericus) R(ex) of Frederick I of Württemberg at the Court facade of the Old Main building, Ludwigsburg Palace, Germany --Llez 05:15, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 05:17, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Monogram F(riedericus) R(ex) of Frederick I of Württemberg at a gate of the Blühendes Barock, Germany --Llez 05:15, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 05:17, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Kenn in Germany-RP, church: Pfarrkirche Sankt Margaretha --Michielverbeek 05:06, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 05:15, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Waldrach in Germany-RP, catholic church: Pfarrkirche Sankt Laurentius --Michielverbeek 05:06, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 05:15, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Syntaxys 08:22, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Sviyazhsk Theotokos Joy of All Who Sorrow Church --Mike1979 Russia 04:59, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Igor123121 05:02, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Harmonide 00:04, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Sviyazhsk Holy Trinity Church --Mike1979 Russia 04:59, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Igor123121 05:02, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Sviyazhsk Lower Vocational School and Fire Frigade Fuildings --Mike1979 Russia 04:59, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Igor123121 05:02, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Sviyazhsk Medvedev — Brovkin House --Mike1979 Russia 04:59, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Igor123121 05:02, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Sviyazhsk Kamenev House --Mike1979 Russia 04:59, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Igor123121 05:02, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination 2025, Kraków, Zajezdnia tramwaju normalnotorowego, ul. św. Wawrzyńca 12, 13, 17 --Igor123121 04:55, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:23, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination 2025, Kraków, Ulica Krakowska 11 --Igor123121 04:55, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 05:18, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Syntaxys 08:22, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination 2025, Kraków, Cmentarz Rakowicki (400) --Igor123121 04:55, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 05:18, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination 2025, Kraków, Bazylika Bożego Ciała, ul. Bożego Ciała 26 --Igor123121 04:55, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality --Michielverbeek 05:18, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination 2025, Kraków, Bazylika Bożego Ciała, ul. Bożego Ciała 26 --Igor123121 04:55, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 05:20, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Roman Theatre of Orange, France, during a rehearsal for summer festival Chorégies d'Orange --Uoaei1 04:26, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Harmonide 11:34, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Winged altar at the parish church Zwickenberg, municipality of Oberdrauburg, Carinthia, Austria --Uoaei1 04:26, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:24, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Pentecost and Christ Pantocrator − Fresco in the parish church Zwickenberg, municipality of Oberdrauburg, Carinthia, Austria --Uoaei1 04:26, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Llez 05:18, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Saint Leonard at the winged altar of the parish church Zwickenberg, municipality of Oberdrauburg, Carinthia, Austria --Uoaei1 04:26, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Llez 05:19, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Saint Lawrence at the winged altar of the parish church Zwickenberg, municipality of Oberdrauburg, Carinthia, Austria --Uoaei1 04:26, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Llez 05:19, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Aekingerzand
  • Promotion Aekingerzand]] Drents-Friese Wold National Park. Dead Birch (Betula) fallen in a heathland pond.
    --Agnes Monkelbaan 04:13, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:15, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Nice job. --Harmonide 11:34, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Ossuary with war memorial in the former cemetery chapel in Ebern --Plozessor 03:57, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:16, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Harmonide 11:34, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Klimczok Mountain Shelter in the Silesian Beskids --Jakubhal 03:57, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
    Are you sure about the WB here? The backsides of the guideposts and the reflections on the bench seem blueish. --Plozessor 04:04, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
     Comment I was pretty sure, until now. I have changed it to warmer and less blueish --Jakubhal 04:14, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Thx, very good now. --Plozessor 03:42, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination East Menagerie fountain in Peterhof, Saint Petersburg, Russia. --Екатерина Борисова 03:17, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality --Michielverbeek 05:21, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Dark pink Hibiscus in Orangery Garden of Lower Park, Peterhof, Saint Petersburg, Russia. --Екатерина Борисова 03:17, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Photographic art “Witches’ Dance Trilogy” (based on a view of the buoys at the buoy yard), Norderney, Lower Saxony, Germany. (BTW: It's already FP.) --XRay 03:01, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Rarely promoting photo art, but this one IS good. --Plozessor 04:02, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Very very nice.--Lmbuga 13:37, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Face of Gondu Tribesman by PagillaVijay --I.Mahesh 01:21, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Blur --Dev Jadiya 07:25, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Gond tribe while dressing for gussadi by Shraayan Palle --I.Mahesh 01:21, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Not sharp enough. You can try a crop version instead. --Dev Jadiya 07:25, 7 October 2025 (UTC)

October 6, 2025

• 
  • Nomination: View across a field, located in the Weststadt of Neu-Ulm, to the Ulm Minster --FlocciNivis 16:34, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Good photo but it should be shifted, church tower is not straight. --Gower 17:45, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
     Done, I performed PC --FlocciNivis 17:38, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
     Comment @Gower: Please do not send images to the discussion section if you are just making a comment to the author rather than opposing another reviewer. Use button Comment, not button Discuss. -- Екатерина Борисова 03:26, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
    Returned to Nomination section. Lvova 09:24, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: View along a building of the Ensemble Brauerei Becker. --FlocciNivis 16:34, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Nice but high CA on trees branches and overexposed sky. --Gower 17:59, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
    Returned to Nomination section. Please, use Comment if you have a comment. Lvova 09:23, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination South Indian food at Sambarpot, Lajpat Nagar 2, New DelhiI --Dev Jadiya 15:14, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose The Dosa seems out of focus and is generally not very sharp and detailed. I also think, that a different crop inculding the lower corner of the Dosa would improve the composition by a lot --FlocciNivis 18:28, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
    Thanks for the review. I will keep in mind --Dev Jadiya 07:00, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
    @Dev Jadiya: As far as I see, you don't say that you disagree, so you should not change the status. I returned Decline back, this photo should not be in CR section. Lvova 08:47, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: 2025, Kraków, Dom Długosza w Krakowie --Igor123121 15:56, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Composition doesn't highlight the main theme: door --Gower 18:40, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
    Returned to Nomination section. Please, use Comment if you have a comment. And the main topic here is definetely not a door, but a portal. Lvova 09:12, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
    Portal of course, not the door, but photo was cropped in the meantime --Gower 13:58, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Aerial view of the US Army urban warfare training site in Mainz-Finthen --MB-one 18:26, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    A bit random composition and perspective. --Gower 18:40, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
    Returned to Nomination section. Please, use Comment if you have a comment. Lvova 09:10, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The Partnach in Garmisch-Partenkirchen --FlocciNivis 16:34, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
    Not typical white balance, red hue. --Gower 17:59, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
     Done --FlocciNivis 17:46, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
    Returned to Nomination section. Please, use Comment if you have a comment. Lvova 08:55, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Lvova 10:05, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Wladzimer Rusakovich. First day of Wikimedia CEE Meeting 2025. --Красный 08:25, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Pink shirt from the left, maybe different cropping? --Gower 17:59, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
    Returned to Nomination section. Please, use Comment if you have a comment. Lvova 08:54, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Nikolskaya Tower - Moscow --Юрий Д.К. 23:58, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 03:21, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Gower 13:58, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: View of Grand Kremlin Palace in 2025 --Юрий Д.К. 23:58, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    There is a dust spot left of the cloud, this should be cloned away. Otherwise good quality. --Syntaxys 02:55, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
    @Syntaxys: Done, thanks. Please review. --Юрий Д.К. 12:16, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Augustinian convent in Crémieu, Isere, France. --Tournasol7 20:38, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Nice, but the wall of the right has a purple fringe. --Sebring12Hrs 21:19, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
    Upper left area: Clear CAs and strong blue halo on the corner--Lmbuga 21:21, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Škoda Kodiaq II RS in Stuttgart --Alexander-93 18:32, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Mini Aceman John Cooper Works in Stuttgar --Alexander-93 18:32, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Auto-Union Typ C at IAA 2025 --Alexander-93 17:14, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    interesting photo, but kind of 'plastic' texture and strong contrast on tires --Gower 17:45, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: View from the hydroelectric power plant Pielweichs to the South on the Isar --FlocciNivis 16:34, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Kraków, Kamienica Pod Złotą Głową w Krakowie 2025 --Igor123121 15:56, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
     Oppose crooked photo (see line of windows) --Gower 16:07, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
    @Gower:  Done By the way, you used the template incorrectly :) --Igor123121 16:26, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Aqua Pour Homme Eau de Toilette is a fresh, masculine fragrance designed with a sleek and modern aesthetic.I, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license:This media has been uploaded as a part of Project Korikath --A S M Jobaer 09:56, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Aqua Pour Homme Eau de Toilette is a fresh, masculine fragrance designed with a sleek and modern aesthetic.I, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license:This media has been uploaded as a part of Project Korikath --A S M Jobaer 09:56, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Konstantinos Stampoulis and Marios Magioladitis. First day of Wikimedia CEE Meeting 2025. Grand Hotel Palace, Thessaloniki, Greece. --Красный 08:25, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose The subject is blur --Dev Jadiya 07:22, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Toni Ristovski. First day of Wikimedia CEE Meeting 2025. --Красный 08:25, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Mediocre quality, high noise. --Gower 18:40, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Shivaliks and snow-capped ranges of the Himalayas, view from Jammu - Delhi flight, Jammu division, India. By User:Tagooty --UnpetitproleX 08:02, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Withdrawn
    The original image is already QI. The only change is this edited version is a tweak of WB. I do not think the edited version should also be QI, otherwise there could be many QIs by editing one original. --Tagooty 08:39, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
    I disagree as the improvement does make this version better, but out of respect for the author's (your) wishes,  I withdraw my nomination. Thanks for your inputs. :) UnpetitproleX 16:27, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Ravana Ella Rajamaha Vihara is a Buddhist temple near Ravana Falls, Ella, Sri Lanka. --Satdeep Gill 06:41, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Dev Jadiya 07:32, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Ravana Ella Rajamaha Vihara is a Buddhist temple near Ravana Falls, Ella, Sri Lanka. --Satdeep Gill 06:41, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Silea hydroelectric power station --Kallerna 06:20, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Needs slight perspective correction (not parallel vertical lines of the building) --Gower 16:23, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
    Thanks, fixed! --Kallerna 04:55, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Weir in Kłodzko --Jacek Halicki 06:17, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality, but rather dull lighing. --Gower 16:23, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: 2025, Poznań, bazylika archikatedralna Świętych Apostołów Piotra i Pawła w Poznaniu --Igor123121 04:47, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Wrong (too strong) perspective; the walls look as if they are narrowing inwards --Gower 16:23, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: 2025, Poznań, bazylika archikatedralna Świętych Apostołów Piotra i Pawła w Poznaniu --Igor123121 04:47, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Column is a bit tilted. --Gower 14:45, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
    Just a comment, so I'm formatting it as a comment again. @Gower: , pay attention pls. --Lvova 14:51, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Sea foam washed up on the beach, Norderney, Lower Saxony, Germany --XRay 04:18, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Blurred --Dev Jadiya 07:32, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Pink Hibiscus in Orangery Garden of Lower Park, Peterhof, Saint Petersburg, Russia. --Екатерина Борисова 03:00, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Tips of the edges are blur --Dev Jadiya 07:30, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Santiago Compostela Cathedral 2023 - Former portico of A Corticela. By User:Fernando --Lmbuga 02:45, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Gower 16:23, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Platanus --Lvova 00:09, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Gower 18:40, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: White tower in Thessaloniki --Lvova 00:09, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Tilted, otherwise good --Plozessor 02:51, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
    Perspective distortion IMO --Lmbuga 03:04, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination A manhole cover in Thessaloniki --Lvova 00:09, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality, but nothing special IMO --Lmbuga 03:01, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
    @Lmbuga: I didn't say that immediately, but as soon as you got followers - you can like, can dislike, but what's the hell is 'nothing special'? It should not be, and your words are a very strange way to express yourself. Lvova 08:08, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
    Forgive me to be alive --Lmbuga 10:13, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
    Don't worry, I forgive you, but I think it could've been discussed with less irony. Lvova 11:16, 7 October 2025 (UTC)

October 5, 2025

• 
  • Nomination: 2025, ul. Długa 5, Kraków, Dom Pod Głowami --Igor123121 07:37, 5 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Side window portals unnecessarily cut --Gower 18:40, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
    Returned to Nomination section. Please, use Comment if you have a comment. Lvova 09:19, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: A building of the Campus Benjamin Franklin in Berlin --FlocciNivis 10:02, 5 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Quite acceptable but too much bush at the bottom.Composition doesn't highlight main theme. --Gower 18:40, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
    Returned to Nomination section. Please, use Comment if you have a comment. Lvova 09:18, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Anastasiya Lvova. Learning day of Wikimedia CEE Meeting 2025. --Красный 10:31, 5 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Good quality but a bit random composition (hand of another guy, empty bottle) --Gower 18:40, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
    Returned to Nomination section. Please, use Comment if you have a comment. Lvova 09:16, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Singhara or Trapa natans in Bhopal, October 2025 --Suyash.dwivedi 20:12, 5 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Giles Laurent 07:48, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Stolberg Castle: Inscription above the entrance --Romzig 18:39, 5 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Crooked a bit. --Gower 16:23, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Коровник (Музей-заповедник В.Д. Поленова). --Celest 17:36, 5 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Overprocessed, a lot of burned out spots. Too intense contrast. --Gower 14:45, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
    Just a comment, so I'm formatting it as a comment again. @Gower: , pay attention pls. --Lvova 14:51, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: «Аббатство» (мастерская художника) (Музей-заповедник В.Д. Поленова). --Celest 17:34, 5 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    PC needed, should be easy ... --Syntaxys 18:44, 5 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Cummins MIS 10 Independent Front Suspension Axle --MB-one 17:08, 5 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Those two guys interfere badly with the composition --Gower 16:23, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: 1976 Opel Commodore GS at the technical inspection for Rallye Monte Carlo Historique 2025 in Bad Homburg --MB-one 17:08, 5 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review It would be a nice photo without the three men. The third one, who appears to be wiping his mouth, is particularly distracting. -- Spurzem 18:37, 5 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Audi TTRS Audi Sport Performance Parts at IAA 2017 --MB-one 17:08, 5 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Ebusco 3.0 at Busworld Europe 2023 --MB-one 17:08, 5 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review It's a bit too distorted, and the reflections make it hard to see anything of the bus. I wouldn't have nominated this photo for an award. -- Spurzem 18:33, 5 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The building of the former girls' grammar school (built in 1911) in Suzdal --Vsatinet 14:35, 5 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Dev Jadiya 07:30, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Tour Sarrasine, Vitrolles --Kallerna 13:43, 5 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
    The background seems blurred to me. Othe ropinions ? --Sebring12Hrs 08:13, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. Blur is not high. --Gower 18:40, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Sidi Ahmed Mosque --User:Mounir Neddi 15:07, 5 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Needs perspective correction. Power line/cable distracts from subject.. --E bailey 15:25, 5 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Amir Timur Museum, Taskhent, Uzbekistan --PetarM 12:49, 5 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
    Good composition, but light balance could be improved in shadows and right side of building. --E bailey 15:31, 5 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Waw! This building and this picture are both amazing. --Harmonide 00:46, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Devonaboy mosque, Andijan --PetarM 11:35, 5 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
    Very good, but windows are overexposed. Fixable? --Vsatinet 14:57, 5 October 2025 (UTC) @Vsatinet Hard to do more here. Contrast was very big; inside very dark, and sunshine out. Yet a bit difference when you see Domes of churches. --PetarM 07:17, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
    You are right, and I understand the issue, but often when processing the original RAW file you can get some detail in the highlights (in this case, for example, you might try to get a sharper image of the window frames). --Vsatinet 11:03, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Waw! This is amazing. --Harmonide 00:46, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Nikos Lokomitros. Learning day of Wikimedia CEE Meeting 2025. --Красный 10:31, 5 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Mediocre quality, face out of focus. --Gower 18:40, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Vitaliy Zdanevich. Learning day of Wikimedia CEE Meeting 2025. --Красный 10:31, 5 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Face out of focus + chaotic surroundings --Gower 16:23, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Christos Varvantakis. Learning day of Wikimedia CEE Meeting 2025. --Красный 10:31, 5 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Maybe different heavier cropping could be better? --Gower 14:45, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Great horsetail in the FFH-area Mangfall valley --FlocciNivis 10:02, 5 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Horsetail main theme is not properly exposed from the background. --Gower 18:40, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Ksar AounCette photo décrit un monument historique protégé en Tunisie et identifié par l'ID 83-35.Moi, en tant que détenteur des droits d’auteur sur cette œuvre, je la publie sous la licence suivante :Cette image a été versée dans le cadre de Wiki Loves Monuments 2025. --Skander zarrad 09:32, 5 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
    I think the perspective needs to be corrected: the doors on the right are tilted to the left and those on the left are tilted to the right. --Lmbuga 21:25, 5 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support I agree it's tilted and must be fixed. But as soon as it is done, it will be remarkable. --Harmonide 00:46, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Angelochori --Lvova 08:06, 5 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Tournus (Saône-et-Loire, France) - Greuze street --Benjism89 07:55, 5 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Withdrawn
    This has a lot of CA in the upper part. --Plozessor 02:56, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
    No problem with the slight CAs, but there is a strange texture artifact in the sky which occupies a large area. See note. --Sebring12Hrs 11:19, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
    @Plozessor : thanks, CAs fixed. @Sebring12Hrs : I'm not completely sure about the texture artefact you mentioned but I tried to fix it --Benjism89 16:29, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
    Not really visible as the sky is more or less blown out, but if you increase the contast, you get this: https://ibb.co/V0yrF78W --Plozessor 04:09, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
    I increased contrast on my processing software and it's not visible, but OK, I can understand how there could be reddish overexposed areas here. Not one of my best pictures anyway so I'll withdraw it, sorry. --Benjism89 05:48, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Nissan Interstar III at autoMOBIL Tübingen 2025 --Alexander-93 07:52, 5 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Gower 18:40, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Mercedes-Benz C174 350 4Matic at autoMOBIL Tübingen 2025 --Alexander-93 07:52, 5 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: 2025, Kraków, Kamienica (schronisko brata Alberta) --Igor123121 07:37, 5 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    PC is needed. --Sebring12Hrs 11:25, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
    @Sebring12Hrs:  Done :) --Igor123121 18:46, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
    Thanks for your effort, perspective is ok, but the crop is may be too tight. Other opinion ? --Sebring12Hrs 21:49, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Senningen in Luxembourg, church: Kirche Mariä Himmelfahrt --Michielverbeek 06:51, 5 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Tower is a bit tilted --Gower 14:45, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination 13 Stryjeńskiej Street in Kłodzko --Jacek Halicki 06:21, 5 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Gower 18:40, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Group of trees near the White Dune, Norderney, Lower Saxony, Germany --XRay 05:27, 5 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
    CA and green fringing --Julian Lupyan 01:54, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
     Done I've improved CA reduction, but honestly, I can't find CAs. --XRay 05:13, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Harmonide 00:46, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Groyne at western head, Norderney, Lower Saxony, Germany --XRay 05:27, 5 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
    To be honest, it's a beautiful picture and the shallow DoF works well for it, but it seems to be slightly motion blurred. --Syntaxys 07:31, 5 October 2025 (UTC)
     Done Sorry, I can't see visible motion blur. But I've made several improvements including sharpness. Hopefully it's OK now. --XRay 08:36, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support I doubted because of the blur, but it's such a beautiful picture when you don't zoom too much on it to examine details. --Harmonide 00:46, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

October 4, 2025

• 
  • Nomination: A building in Scholari --Lvova 00:05, 4 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Bizarre composition, image shows a road or a building? --Gower 18:40, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
    Surprisingly both. Returned to Nomination section. Please, use Comment if you have a comment. Lvova 08:57, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Sunset clouds captured above Velagapudi, Amaravati --I.Mahesh 02:46, 5 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --MB-one 13:03, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination AVS Combattants monument on Puducherry beach road --I.Mahesh 01:25, 5 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. Very good composition. --Gower 18:40, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Front section of a Pilatus PC-24 at EBACE 2018 --MB-one 22:01, 4 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Vsatinet 11:28, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Schwalbe bicycle tires at Cycling World Europe 2025 --MB-one 22:01, 4 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    First tire not very sharp --Gower 16:23, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Participants of ADAC Deutschland Klassik 2025 entering Alte Brücke ("Old Bridge") in Heidelberg --MB-one 22:01, 4 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Half of image is the road, not very pretty composition. --Gower 13:58, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Winnie Kabintie at Wikimania 2024 in Katowice --MB-one 22:01, 4 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
    I think fully cropped out the partly-cropped man on the right will be a better composition --Tagooty 04:16, 5 October 2025 (UTC)
     Done Thanks for the review --MB-one 09:39, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Tagooty 09:40, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Mercedes-Benz eIntouro M at Busworld Europe 2025 --MB-one 22:01, 4 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Gower 16:23, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Cathedral of Sarsina, Italy. --Terragio67 17:17, 4 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
    Technically ok, but not sure about the composition. Per description the subject is the cathedral, but why then are parts of the cathedral missing while there's the square in front of it and other buildings? --Plozessor 03:05, 5 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. I edited the description. --Sebring12Hrs 20:33, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Neel and Anita Tamang are Nepali workers who build Pakbu (Ladakhi mudbrick) in Shey village, Ladakh. --Satdeep Gill 16:50, 4 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Needs a precise description and caption. CATs could also be improved. --Tagooty 04:24, 5 October 2025 (UTC)
     Done @Tagooty: --Satdeep Gill 06:46, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
    The DoF is marginal, too much in the composition. Cropping to the bricks in front and left centre will make a better image, IMO. --Tagooty 08:46, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Neel and Anita Tamang are Nepali workers who build Pakbu (Ladakhi mudbrick) in Shey village, Ladakh. --Satdeep Gill 16:50, 4 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Trees look a bit tilted --Gower 14:45, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Neel and Anita Tamang are Nepali workers who build Pakbu (Ladakhi mudbrick) in Shey village, Ladakh. --Satdeep Gill 16:50, 4 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --MB-one 13:03, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Rear view of 2025 Nissan Note Autech Line --TTTNIS 15:22, 4 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Lvova 09:54, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination 1991 Nissan FEV --TTTNIS 15:22, 4 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Dev Jadiya 05:58, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Rear view of 1991 Nissan FEV --TTTNIS 15:22, 4 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Dev Jadiya 05:58, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Bridge at Matejki Street in Kłodzko after flood 2 by User:Jacek Halicki--Boston9 15:03, 4 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --MB-one 13:03, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Gower 14:45, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Eurofighter Typhoon of the 51st Wing at the second edition of the Balloon Cup, Piacenza-San Damiano airport, September 2025. --Hotolmo22 15:23, 4 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Lvova 09:54, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: View across a field adjacent to the bird sanctuary Ismaninger Speichersee und Fischteiche with the alps and tower cranes in the background --FlocciNivis 10:52, 4 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    I see some dust spots. --Lvova 09:54, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Renault 4 E-Tech Electric at Automesse Ludwigsburg 2025 --Alexander-93 09:56, 4 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Dev Jadiya 05:58, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Wooden observation tower in protected landscape area Berger Moos at Pfronten --Tuxyso 08:08, 4 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 12:17, 4 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 12:24, 4 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Velvet 09:53, 5 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Gower 18:40, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality.
     Support Good quality. --MB-one 13:03, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
     Comment Big bug here....
• 
  • Nomination Nikodia or Texas Sage in Bhopal in October 2025 --Suyash.dwivedi 07:54, 4 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Not so bad ! --Sebring12Hrs 20:40, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Protected landscape area Berger Moos at Pfronten with view to Kienberg and church St. Nikolaus --Tuxyso 07:50, 4 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion Very good compo. --Sebring12Hrs 20:41, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Topis (Damaliscus lunatus), Masai Mara, Kenya --Poco a poco 07:01, 4 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose It lacks sharpness, sorry. --Sebring12Hrs 20:39, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination 2025 Kraków, Kamienica, XV-XVI w --Igor123121 06:59, 4 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
    PC is needed. --Sebring12Hrs 08:10, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
    @Sebring12Hrs:  Done :) --Igor123121 18:46, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 20:30, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: 2025 Kraków, Kościół św. Katarzyny Aleksandryjskiej i św. Małgorzaty w Krakowie --Igor123121 06:59, 4 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Crooked a bit. --Gower 14:45, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
     Done --Igor123121 17:04, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: 2025 Przemyśl, Pałac biskupów gr.-kat., Plac Tadeusza Czackiego 3 w Przemyślu --Igor123121 06:59, 4 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Perspective correction needed, vertical lines of a building aren't parallel --Gower 14:45, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
     Done --Igor123121 17:04, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: ZIL-130 at Seifullin avenue at the corner with Gogol street. Almaty, Kazakhstan. --Красный 06:47, 4 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Acceptable but ZIL is blending with bus behind it --Gower 16:23, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Anastasiya Lvova at the Learning day of Wikimedia CEE Meeting 2025. --Красный 06:47, 4 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review I would try BW, since strange mix of colors. --PetarM 11:56, 5 October 2025 (UTC)
    Probably, because of the weird mix of yellow artificial lights and natural light, but I dislike the idea of BW photographs in modern era. --Красный 14:35, 5 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Vito carluccio, obelisco in onore di ferdinando I di borbone, 1822 (by Sailko) --Sebring12Hrs 04:01, 4 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Lvova 09:50, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Façade detail, Avenida Fontes Pereira de Melo 39, Lisbon, Portugal (by Julesvernex2) --Sebring12Hrs 04:01, 4 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Quite dark --Gower 16:23, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Façade detail, Avenida Fontes Pereira de Melo 39, Lisbon, Portugal (by Julesvernex2) --Sebring12Hrs 04:01, 4 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --MB-one 13:03, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Pomona statue (detail) in Upper Gardens of Peterhof, Saint Petersburg, Russia. --Екатерина Борисова 03:11, 4 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Sculpture surface is not very detailed --Gower 16:23, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Dolphin fountain figure in Upper Gardens of Peterhof, Saint Petersburg, Russia. --Екатерина Борисова 03:11, 4 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Gower 14:45, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Dragon and Dolphin fountain figures in Upper Gardens of Peterhof, Saint Petersburg, Russia. --Екатерина Борисова 03:11, 4 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Blur --Dev Jadiya 05:58, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Big Stone Bridge and moving ship --Юрий Д.К. 00:45, 4 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed

October 3, 2025

• 
  • Nomination: 2025 Kraków, Warneńczyka 10-Rejtana 15 --Igor123121 04:55, 3 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    PC is needed. Look at the verticals at left (red/orange building) and may be a bit underexposed. --Sebring12Hrs 08:07, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
    @Sebring12Hrs:  Done :) --Igor123121 18:46, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
    Could you increase exposure a bit ? --Sebring12Hrs 20:44, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
    A bit dark. --Harmonide 00:46, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
    Returned to Nomination section. Please, use Comment if you have a comment. Lvova 09:29, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Ireland, Clonmacnoise, Temple Melaghlin --Berthold Werner 15:57, 3 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Some CAs on the walls, especially at left. Otherwise good. --Sebring12Hrs 20:34, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
    Isn't it a bit tilted? --Harmonide 00:32, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
    Returned to Nomination section. Please, use Comment if you have a comment. Lvova 09:26, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Theresiastraat in The Hague --ReneeWrites 22:30, 3 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Perspective correction needed. --Gower 13:58, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Bosch Performance Lince CX mid-mounted bicycle motor at IAA Mobility 2025 --MB-one 21:43, 3 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Dev Jadiya 05:58, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Hoatzin (Opisthocomus hoazin) --Charlesjsharp 19:28, 3 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
    It appears slightly oversharpened in places, and there is an pixel error near the bottom left at the last half circle of the bokeh. --Syntaxys 02:42, 4 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Great pic! Great job! --Harmonide 00:32, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The Great Triumphant Bell, Ghent, Belgium --Julian Lupyan 15:16, 3 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Overall no very sharp or blurred and bad compo/crop IMO. --Sebring12Hrs 20:35, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination An entrance to Ehrenbreitstein Fortress, Koblenz, Germany --Julian Lupyan 15:16, 3 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Not very in focus. --Sebring12Hrs 20:43, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Wilhelmsallee 13 and the Church of St. Alexandra in Bad Ems, Germany --Julian Lupyan 15:16, 3 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Too blurred. --Sebring12Hrs 20:43, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The Statue of St. Joan of Arc on a spire of Milan Cathedral, overlooking a cloudy day, 2025 --Julian Lupyan 15:16, 3 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline
    Only part is in the focus, sorry. --Lvova 19:13, 4 October 2025 (UTC)
    The top of the statue is blurred. --Sebring12Hrs 20:43, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
     Oppose Well, as it said, sorry. --Lvova 09:48, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Statue of St. Primus, Milan Cathedral, overlooking Milan's Zone 9 in 2025 --Julian Lupyan 15:16, 3 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline
    I expected that the statue will be in the focus. --Lvova 19:13, 4 October 2025 (UTC)
     Oppose Per Lvova and the background in leaning. --Sebring12Hrs 20:43, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Canarian Bean Caper at the Playa de Los Abriguitos in Abades, Tenerife, Spain --FlocciNivis 09:05, 3 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Overexposed a bit and partially out of focus. --Gower 13:58, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Speke's weaver (Ploceus spekei), Lake Nakuru National Park, Kenya --Poco a poco 07:00, 3 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose The bird is very unsharp, and some leaves are blown out. Sorry. --Екатерина Борисова 02:40, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination “Kur-Theater” (and cinema), Norderney, Lower Saxony, Germany --XRay 05:21, 3 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Discussion
     Oppose unreasonable angle --Gower 14:45, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
    The angle may be unusual, but this can't be a reason. --XRay 05:24, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Pump station (for wastewater), Norderney, Lower Saxony, Germany --XRay 05:21, 3 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --MB-one 13:03, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: 2025 Poznań, Kamienica Grodzickich --Igor123121 04:55, 3 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Distorted (due to perspective correction I suppose). Judging by the other photos in the category, the upper part of the portal should be horizontal, but here it's concave. --Екатерина Борисова 05:17, 3 October 2025 (UTC)
    @Екатерина Борисова:  Done --Igor123121 06:07, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
    Sorry, but it's still concave. --Екатерина Борисова 02:37, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Moscow - 2024 - Church of Saint George in Pskov Hill --Юрий Д.К. 00:24, 3 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Tower from the left isn't sharp, building from the right or whole image needs perspective correction. --Gower 14:45, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Port of Thessaloniki --Lvova 00:03, 3 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    The board is a little crooked --Gower 13:58, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
    Tnx, check now pls. --Lvova 15:47, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

October 2, 2025

• 
  • Nomination Kazan Alexandrovsky Passage --Mike1979 Russia 05:42, 2 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
    Nice photo. But the building appears to be tilted. Could you please fix this? --AFBorchert 10:04, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
    Not fixed yet? --Harmonide 00:32, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
    Returned to Nomination section. Please, use Comment if you have a comment. And what's the question? There is no new versions, so yes. not fixed. Lvova 09:21, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
    Tried to fix. New version. --Mike1979 Russia 10:15, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support It is better now, thank you: Good quality. --AFBorchert 11:40, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Boss in the Saint Catherine's Church of Hoogstraten --ReneeWrites 23:38, 2 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Good composition, but not very detailed, looks as if it was heavily denoised --Gower 14:45, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Balcony of Vyborg-Bank, Vyborg, Russia. By User:ElenaLitera --Екатерина Борисова 23:31, 2 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --MB-one 11:59, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• • Nomination: Mandelbrot Set Color Cycling Video 1080p --Aokoroko 21:26, 2 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• • Nomination: Mandelbrot Set Color Cycling Video 1080p --Aokoroko 21:26, 2 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• • Nomination: Mandelbrot Set Color Cycling Video 1080p --Aokoroko 21:26, 2 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• • Nomination: Mandelbrot Set Color Cycling Video 1080p --Aokoroko 21:26, 2 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Manhole cover at Artyom street. Almaty, Kazakhstan. --Красный 20:06, 2 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Gower 16:23, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Lotos cafe in Efremov --Юрий Д.К. 19:07, 2 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --MB-one 11:59, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The outdoor clock in fron of the directorate building on the Otto-Wagner-Areal in Vienna, Austria --FlocciNivis 18:37, 2 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Юрий Д.К. 03:37, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination 2025 Nissan X-Trail Autech Sports Spec e-4ORCE --TTTNIS 13:45, 2 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
    this image looks tilted. Can you straighten the virtual horizon line? --E bailey 22:36, 4 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support OK. --Harmonide 00:32, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Mercedes-Benz C174 350 4Matic at IAA 2025 --Alexander-93 10:26, 2 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Not sharp enough --Dev Jadiya 05:58, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Street "Bielkenhagen" in the old town of Stralsund, a Unesco site --MB-one 08:56, 2 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Maybe different cropping to eliminate bottom shadow? --Gower 16:23, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: 2025, Kraków, Cmentarz Rakowicki w Krakowie --Igor123121 05:18, 2 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination 2025, Kraków, Cmentarz Rakowicki w Krakowie --Igor123121 05:18, 2 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Dev Jadiya 05:58, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Black rhinoceros (Diceros bicornis), Lake Nakuru National Park, Kenya --Poco a poco 04:25, 2 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Blur --Dev Jadiya 05:58, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Black rhinoceros (Diceros bicornis), Lake Nakuru National Park, Kenya --Poco a poco 04:25, 2 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --MB-one 11:59, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Black rhinoceros (Diceros bicornis), Lake Nakuru National Park, Kenya --Poco a poco 04:25, 2 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Not sharp enough --Dev Jadiya 05:58, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Detail of a fishing boat in the harbour, Greetsiel, Krummhörn, Lower Saxony, Germany --XRay 04:25, 2 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 02:41, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Buddha Statue at Sindhu Ghat, Shey, Ladakh (July 2025). --Satdeep Gill 02:30, 2 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
    Nice, but too tight upside and downside --Vsatinet 11:28, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Yes. A bit tight but still OK for me. This is a nice shot. --Harmonide 00:32, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

October 1, 2025

• 
  • Nomination: Malooti Terracotta Temple - By User:Saikat Surai --Sumitsurai 16:55, 1 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Malooti Terracotta Temple - By User:Saikat Surai --Sumitsurai 16:55, 1 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --MB-one 14:26, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Ghurisha Lakkhi Janardan Temple Terracotta Panels - By User:Saikat Surai --Sumitsurai 16:55, 1 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --MB-one 11:59, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Altar of Saint Catherine in the Saint Catherine's church of Hoogstraten --ReneeWrites 15:52, 1 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --MB-one 11:59, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination DS 7 (2022) in Stuttgart --Alexander-93 15:35, 1 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Юрий Д.К. 03:37, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Renault 4 E-Tech Electric in Stuttgart --Alexander-93 15:35, 1 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Юрий Д.К. 03:37, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Volvo XC60 (SPA) in Stuttgart --Alexander-93 15:35, 1 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --MB-one 11:59, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination St Desiderius church in St-Éloy-d'Allier, Allier, France. --Tournasol7 12:22, 1 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline
    This is strongly backlit - can you bring up the shadows? --Acroterion 01:20, 2 October 2025 (UTC)
     Oppose Should be taken in another light. --Harmonide 00:32, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Aluminium luggage at Passenger Experience Week 2024 in Hamburg --MB-one 12:07, 1 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Perspective correction, please --Lmbuga 13:54, 1 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Rock ptarmigan (Lagopus muta islandorum) female --Charlesjsharp 11:23, 1 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --MB-one 11:59, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Common eider (Somateria mollissima borealis) --Charlesjsharp 11:23, 1 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
    There are some strange reflections or artefacts in the wet vegetation around the duck, this is really disturbing and should be at least softened. --Syntaxys 11:59, 1 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Beautiful picture. --Harmonide 00:32, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: View over Thessaloniki from Pyrgos Aliseos --Kritzolina 09:45, 1 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    A bit too dark on the settlement IMO --MB-one 11:59, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Citizen Investment Trust (CIT) Nepal --Bijay Chaurasia 08:09, 1 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --MB-one 11:59, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Raifsky Bogoroditsky Monastery XVII century Monk Building --Mike1979 Russia 07:23, 1 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --MB-one 11:59, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination A manhole cover in Litochoro --Lvova 06:08, 1 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 02:43, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination A manhole cover in Katerini --Lvova 06:08, 1 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Gower 14:45, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination A manhole cover in Katerini --Lvova 06:08, 1 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --MB-one 11:59, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: UlicaGenerałaStanisławaSosabowskiego-ŚcieżkiRowerowe-PrądnikBiały-POL, Kraków --Igor123121 05:45, 1 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    It needs a perspective correction --Poco a poco 08:45, 1 October 2025 (UTC)
    @Poco a poco:  Done --Igor123121 06:23, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
    Better now, there is though some noise and CA, can you please remove them? --Poco a poco 06:22, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
    Not very detailed but acceptable. --Gower 14:45, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: National Holiday of the Third of May 2025, Jan Matejko Square, Kraków, Poland --Igor123121 05:45, 1 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Tenement house, 21 Szeroka Street, Kraków, Poland --Igor123121 05:45, 1 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
    Tilted in ccw direction and you may want to create the added category --Poco a poco 08:45, 1 October 2025 (UTC)
    @Poco a poco:  Done --Igor123121 06:23, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 06:22, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Stanisława Sosabowskieg street, tram track, view to S, Kraków, Poland --Igor123121 05:45, 1 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --MB-one 11:59, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Rudbeckia laciniata in Orangery Garden of Lower Park, Peterhof, Saint Petersburg, Russia. --Екатерина Борисова 02:40, 1 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --MB-one 11:59, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

September 30, 2025

• 
  • Nomination Fiat Idea parked in Tandil, Argentina --Ezarate 21:30, 30 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Not enough detail, I'm afraid --MB-one 11:59, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Common Toothwort in the FFH-area Isarauen von Unterföhring bis Landshut in Marzling --FlocciNivis 16:29, 30 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Flat light due to flashlight, flower is surrounded by too much foliage. --Gower 16:23, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: A water pump in the Natur-Park Schöneberger Südgelände --FlocciNivis 16:29, 30 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Color grading reminds analogue vintage picture, it is intentional? CA (wires) --Gower 16:23, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination A building of the Völklingen Ironworks --FlocciNivis 16:29, 30 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --MB-one 11:59, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Rear view of 1987 Honda Prelude 2.0XX --TTTNIS 13:48, 30 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --MB-one 07:58, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Rear view of 2025 Nissan Roox Highway Star G Turbo --TTTNIS 13:48, 30 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --MB-one 08:10, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Policlinic in Moscow --Perituss 13:26, 30 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality --Michielverbeek 05:26, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Aerial view of Golf Course Heddesheim --MB-one 13:17, 30 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline
    Very nice view but unfortunately too blurry --Vsatinet 07:40, 2 October 2025 (UTC)
     Oppose Too blurry for me too. --Harmonide 00:32, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Volkswagen stand at IAA Open Space 2023 in Munich --MB-one 13:17, 30 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Little CA on WV logo. --Gower 14:45, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Rear interior, Guest House, IIT Gandhinagar, Gujarat, India --Tagooty 10:38, 30 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Sorry, but almost nothing is sharp here. --Екатерина Борисова 03:41, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
     Oppose Not a neat frame. --Harmonide 00:04, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Smart Hashtag 5 Premium at autoMOBIL Tübingen 2025 --Alexander-93 10:33, 30 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --MB-one 07:58, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination West facade, Central Arcade, IIT Gandhinagar, Gujarat, India --Tagooty 03:31, 30 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --MB-one 08:10, 7 October 2025 (UTC)

September 29, 2025

• 
  • Nomination: Common snipe (Gallinago gallinago faeroeensis) --Charlesjsharp 08:36, 29 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    low contrast and strange WB (too purple) IMO --George Chernilevsky 20:28, 29 September 2025 (UTC)
    Very nice. But I agree for the low contrast. Can it be fixed? --Harmonide 00:22, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
    Returned to Nomination section. Please, use Comment if you have a comment. Lvova 09:28, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Tomb of Sultan Muhammad Qutb Shah with sunstar --I.Mahesh 23:36, 29 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Looking overprocessed. Sorry --Dev Jadiya 07:11, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
     Oppose Sun + blurred lines... Not working for me. --Harmonide 00:04, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination A manhole cover in Asvestochori town --Lvova 21:11, 29 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --MB-one 08:10, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Gower 14:45, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination War memorial in Chiusi, Italy --Sailko 18:45, 29 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
    Please add caption and description. --E bailey 03:38, 30 September 2025 (UTC)
    Lighting could be improved in the shadows. --E bailey 03:42, 30 September 2025 (UTC)
    It is a natural shadow from a cloud passing by and leaving the main subject in the spotlight, so I'd rather keep it unedited. --Sailko 08:30, 30 September 2025 (UTC)
    I'm undecided. Would like other people to make judgement. --E bailey 13:47, 2 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support It's OK for me. --Harmonide 00:22, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: The house at the Rheinallee 61 in Mainz --FlocciNivis 17:17, 29 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    The bottom crop is too tight. --Sebring12Hrs 08:04, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination View across the Maschsee to the Courtyard by Marriott in Hannover --FlocciNivis 17:17, 29 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --MB-one 08:10, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Škoda Kodiaq II RS in Stuttgart --Alexander-93 14:50, 29 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --MB-one 07:55, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Jewish cemetery in Bardejov, Slovakia --Pudelek 13:00, 29 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Not sharp enough sorry --Dev Jadiya 07:07, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
     Oppose Shadow doesn't help. --Gower 14:45, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Neoscona oaxacensis, ventral view, Coacalco, Mexico --Cvmontuy 12:10, 29 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose The subject is blur --Dev Jadiya 07:07, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Kraków Kościelniki train stop, platform 1, view to N, Nowa Huta, Kraków, Poland --Igor123121 05:11, 29 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Comment Tilted to the right --Jakubhal 05:35, 29 September 2025 (UTC)
    @Jakubhal:  Done --Igor123121 06:23, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Harmonide 00:22, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Ok, this is one is good enough --Jakubhal 18:08, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

September 28, 2025

• 
  • Nomination Vishnu, 7th-8th Century at Museum inside Coochbehar Palace --Herpking 14:40, 28 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline
    Needs PC --Tagooty 04:57, 4 October 2025 (UTC)
     Oppose Nice subject, but a bit wonky. --Harmonide 00:22, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Inside of Castle Stolzenfels chapel --Virtual-Pano 08:06, 28 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
    Good picture, but CAs On the white objects surrounding the table and on the table itself --Lmbuga 12:39, 4 October 2025 (UTC)
     Done thx - for the hint Virtual-Pano 23:12, 5 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. Better, not perfect. --Lmbuga 01:00, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Very good job. --Harmonide 00:04, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Sviyazhsk Dormition of the Theotokos Church --Mike1979 Russia 07:04, 28 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Comment It might be a QI if you would create more space in the bottom --Michielverbeek 08:42, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Harmonide 00:04, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

September 26, 2025

• 
  • Nomination: Christo Botewa street, view from E, Kraków, Poland --Igor123121 07:58, 26 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Probably it's possible to crop the right side - there is a PC problem and anyway this lifting edge is just sticking out. --Lvova 20:38, 2 October 2025 (UTC)
    @Lvova:  Done --Igor123121 06:23, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
    Probably you didn't upload it. --Lvova 08:53, 6 October 2025 (UTC)

September 25, 2025

• 
  • Nomination: National Museum, Main Building, 1 May, 3 Avenue, Kraków, Poland --Igor123121 17:43, 25 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Right side and bottom part of the image are blurry. --Екатерина Борисова 03:57, 29 September 2025 (UTC)
    @Екатерина Борисова:  Done --Igor123121 06:23, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
    No. You just cropped the image a bit, but the bottom and especially the right side of building are still blurry. --Екатерина Борисова 02:50, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Creative bicycle at VELOBerlin 2024 --MB-one 15:30, 25 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Are details on the chain and wheels fixable? --Lvova 20:32, 2 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Day head aboard a SAY 42 carbon yacht --MB-one 15:30, 25 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline
    It's hard for me to describe this effect, but the image has strange artifacts - they are visible in the mirror, for example. --Lvova 20:32, 2 October 2025 (UTC)
     Oppose The geometry of this pic is quite chaotic. Not something of quality to my eyes, sorry. --Harmonide 00:22, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
     Oppose As above, too chaotic --Gower 14:45, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Bronze skull at the entrance of the Santa Maria delle Anime del Purgatorio ad Arco Church, Naples, Italy (by Julesvernex2) --Sebring12Hrs 09:10, 25 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
    Very dark; the skull is not fully into DoF and not highlighted enough. --Lvova 20:32, 2 October 2025 (UTC)
    The darkness is by design (these alleys in old Naples are gloomy), the other two objections are certainly valid --Julesvernex2 12:39, 3 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Interesting angle. --Harmonide 00:22, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

September 24, 2025

• 
  • Nomination Hamburg-Harburg, residential building Mergellstrasse 5 --KaiBorgeest 21:22, 24 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline
    The cut car is disturbing. --Sebring12Hrs 22:37, 30 September 2025 (UTC)
     Oppose Could be taken with a better light for higher quality. --Harmonide 00:22, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Hydroelectric power plant in Ławica 3 by User:Jacek Halicki --Boston9
  • Promotion
    CA's on branches everywhere. --Екатерина Борисова 03:12, 25 September 2025 (UTC)@Екатерина Борисова: The blue borders sometimes visible in my photos are not CA, but the effect of the low linear resolution of the drone's lens which is the size of a tiny fingernail. When developing raw files, I always use a preset which automatically removes CA from my pics. Please try removing these fringes with any image editing program and you will see for yourself that it is not CA.--Jacek Halicki 07:48, 2 October 2025 (UTC)
    I do not know what other word to call these blue lines, but I know how difficult it is to avoid them when there are tree branches in the frame. That is, I understand the problem. However, a photo with such lines cannot be QI in my opinion. Sorry. --Екатерина Борисова 04:05, 3 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. Colour aberrations visible on trees but main topic is good. --Gower 14:45, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: ePerformance electric power boat --MB-one 17:10, 24 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Wheels and the area behind the boat look not good. --Lvova 20:25, 2 October 2025 (UTC)
    As above, too much chaos behind the boat and a man half-cut in the background. --Gower 14:45, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

Consensual review

Rules

These rules are in accordance with the procedures normally followed in this section. If you don’t agree with them please feel free to propose changes.

• To ask for consensual review, just change the /Promotion, /Decline to /Discuss and add your comments immediately following the review. An automatic bot will move it to the consensual review section within one day. Alternatively move the image line from the main queue to Consensual Review/Images and follow the instructions in the edit window.
• You can move an image here if you contest the decision of the reviewer or have doubts about its eligibility (in which case an 'oppose' is assumed). In any case, please explain your reasons. Our QICBot will move it for you. When the bot moves it, you might have to revisit the nomination and expand your review into the Consensual Review format and add "votes".
• The decision is taken by majority of opinions, including the one of the first reviewer and excluding the nominator's. After a minimum period of 48 hours since the last entry, the decision will be registered at the end of the text using the template {{QICresult}} and then executed, according to the Guidelines.

Using {{support}} or {{oppose}} will make it easier to count your vote.

Votes by anonymous contributors aren't counted

• In case of draw, or if no additional opinions are given other than the first reviewer's, the nomination can be closed as inconclusive after 8 days, counted from its entry.
• Turn any existing comments into bullet points—add  Oppose and  Support if necessary.
• Add a comment explaining why you've moved the image here - be careful to stay inside the braces.
• Preview and save with a sensible edit summary like "+Image:Example.jpg".

File:Beach_between_Tripotamos_and_Langomandra_01.jpg

• Nomination Beach between Tripotamos and Langomandra in Sithonia, Halkidiki, Greece --Kritzolina 17:50, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Support Good quality. --Юрий Д.К. 20:07, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose I don't think it's QI. I think the detail isn't good enough and I see it as underexposed. Small problem: Small problem: Without all the EXIF data--Lmbuga 23:30, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → More votes?   --Peulle 06:41, 9 October 2025 (UTC)

File:Kanał_Lindleya.jpg

• Nomination Lindley canal in Łódź, Poland by Marian Naworski--Gower 15:06, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Support Good quality. --Harmonide 16:25, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose Fascinating, but there are some chromatic aberration and noise --Jakubhal 16:38, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → More votes?   --Peulle 06:46, 9 October 2025 (UTC)

File:Die_Marksburg_im_Winter.jpg

• Nomination Marksburg im Winter -- Rolf Kranz 13:17, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
   Support What a sight! --Harmonide 13:35, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose Quite nice, but a bit 'plastic' look of castle surface. Weird white halo around spires. --Gower 13:58, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

• @Gower: done.Thanks for your reviews. ---- Rolf Kranz 21:33, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

•  Support Would support this as FP candidate --Uoaei1 06:33, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Support The latest version is much better. Obvious QI for me --Jakubhal 07:03, 9 October 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → More votes?   --Peulle 06:46, 9 October 2025 (UTC)

File:Osthafenbrunnen,_Frankfurt_am_Main_(P1032648).jpg

• Nomination Osthafenbrunnen in Frankfurt-Ostend --MB-one 10:24, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Oppose A closer look would be better for me. --Harmonide 13:13, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

• I disagree. A full view of the object, is not a valid reason to decline. --MB-one 13:29, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

•  Support There is no need to choose between this foreshortening and theoretical another one. Good quality. --Lvova 15:37, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Support Good quality. --Alexander-93 16:23, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote?   --Peulle 06:46, 9 October 2025 (UTC)

File:VDL,_Busworld_Europe_2025,_Brussels_(20251002-P1051689).jpg

• Nomination World Premiere of the VDL Futura 3 on the eve of Busworld Europe 2025 --MB-one 10:24, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Oppose As a portrait - not very accurate. As a depiction of a bus - either. --Gower 16:23, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose I go with Gower. --Harmonide 16:40, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Support I disagree. At least the bus is perfectly captured. --Lmbuga 21:13, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

• CAs at top (top right corner of the bus) --Lmbuga 21:28, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

•  Question Does that mean you oppose or are you still supporting? --Peulle 06:46, 9 October 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline?   --Peulle 06:46, 9 October 2025 (UTC)

File:CEEM_2025,_Второй_день_(27).jpg

• Nomination Amir Sarabadani. Second day of Wikimedia CEE Meeting 2025. --Красный 08:59, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Comment Could be croped above. --PetarM 10:36, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Support Good quality. --Harmonide 12:53, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

• @Harmonide: Please, do not promote images with unanswered/unresolved comments. Per PetarM --Jakubhal 16:43, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

• @Jakubhal I did promote. Forgot to put s. --PetarM 17:22, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

•  Oppose Well, I still have issues with this photo. Awkward bottom framing with most of the arms, but with cut-off hands is one. There are also some green CA on the blouse --Jakubhal 18:03, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → More votes?   --Peulle 06:46, 9 October 2025 (UTC)

File:Scholari_11.jpg

• Nomination Scholari --Lvova 08:25, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Support OK. --Harmonide 13:35, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose Large unfavorable shadow in the foreground --Gower 13:58, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

• I don't think it was a problem, but it also wasn't smth too important, so cropped. --Lvova 15:35, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → More votes?   --Peulle 06:46, 9 October 2025 (UTC)

File:Cráter_volcánico,_zona_de_conservación_de_Ngorongoro,_Tanzania,_2024-05-27,_DD_11.jpg

• Nomination Volcanic crater, Ngorongoro Conservation Area, Tanzania --Poco a poco 07:57, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 10:02, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Support Good quality. --Benjism89 10:08, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose Seems quite blurry to me, sorry. --Harmonide 13:35, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote?   --Peulle 06:46, 9 October 2025 (UTC)

File:2025,_Kraków,_Cmentarz_Rakowicki_(401).jpg

• Nomination 2025, Kraków, Cmentarz Rakowicki (401) --Igor123121 06:57, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:04, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose Lack of parallelism. --Harmonide 13:13, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

• @Harmonide: The photo is cropped very symmetrically. --Igor123121 14:38, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

•  Support Good quality. Ok to me, even if there are slight purple CAs. --Sebring12Hrs 16:54, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 21:35, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote?   --Peulle 06:46, 9 October 2025 (UTC)

File:2025,_Kraków,_Ulica_Stolarska_11_(3).jpg

• Nomination 2025, Kraków, Ulica Stolarska 11 (3) --Igor123121 06:57, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Oppose This time I let you include a more specific category (windows?) --Poco a poco 08:04, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose What exactly is supposed to be in focus here? --Harmonide 13:13, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

• @Harmonide: Sorry, but I don’t understand where you see the problem. The photo is technically well taken and shows a detail of the building. Could you clarify why you voted against it? --Igor123121 14:38, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

•  Support What's a day today :) Igor123121, please, don't change the status to comment back if there is a voice... But I agree that technically it is a quality image of the building's details. --Lvova 15:21, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 16:53, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 21:36, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Promote?   --Peulle 06:48, 9 October 2025 (UTC)

File:2025,_Kraków,_Ulica_Karmelicka_1_(3).jpg

• Nomination 2025, Kraków, Ulica Karmelicka 1 (3) --Igor123121 06:57, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 10:03, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Comment Strange texture in the sky at the top right. A bit overexposed. And no clear composition (looks like the building is cut off on the right but not on the left, why ? And why a photograph of only the top of this building, is there something we should notice ? etc) --Benjism89 10:14, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose Agree with the criticism above. --Harmonide 12:53, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

  @Harmonide: Sorry, but I don’t understand where you see the problem. The photo is technically well taken and shows a detail of the building. Could you clarify why you voted against it? --Igor123121 14:38, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

  By the way, he wrote about right top corner of the sky. Lvova 15:33, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

•  Support As far as I see, the sky is fixed, QI imho. Lvova 16:01, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose Overprocessed. Look at the limit between the roof and the sky. --Sebring12Hrs 16:52, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Weak support after the sky and overexposure were fixed. Still a random composition and a bit overprocessed --Benjism89 05:59, 9 October 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Promote?   --Benjism89 05:59, 9 October 2025 (UTC)

File:Raifsky_Bogoroditsky_Monastery_Saints_of_Sinay_and_Raifa_Refectory_Church_2024-07-15_1791.jpg

• Nomination Raifsky Bogoroditsky Monastery Saints of Sinay and Raifa Refectory Church --Mike1979 Russia 05:49, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Support Good quality. --Tisha Mukherjee 06:44, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose Too much sky, and not enough ground. Is it possible to find a balance? --Harmonide 13:40, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → More votes?   --Peulle 07:25, 9 October 2025 (UTC)

File:Orange_Arc_d'Orange_NNW_20250627.jpg

• Nomination Triumphal Arch of Orange (north-northwest view) --Uoaei1 04:50, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
   Support Good quality. --Ermell 05:56, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose It's leaning. Can you fix this? --Harmonide 12:53, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

• @Harmonide: Indeed, this 2000 years old building IS leaning. E.g., if you look at the column at the left, you can see that its upper part bends to the right. Take the background as reference! --Uoaei1 16:58, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

•  Support Good to me like that. It doesn't need PC. --Sebring12Hrs 21:24, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → More votes?   --Peulle 07:25, 9 October 2025 (UTC)

File:Norderney,_Buhne_--_2025_--_9246.jpg

• Nomination Groyne at western head, Norderney, Lower Saxony, Germany --XRay 04:22, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Support Beautifully rendered. --Harmonide 13:40, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose Only the closest groyne is sharp. --Gower 13:58, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose Aaarrgh the only "in focus" area is a bit blurred. Sorry to decline. --Sebring12Hrs 21:26, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline?   --Peulle 07:25, 9 October 2025 (UTC)

File:Shiva_Mahashivaratri_2025423.jpg

• Nomination A devotee in Lord Shiva attire during Mahashivaratri --I.Mahesh 04:16, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Support Incredible. --Harmonide 13:40, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose Technically not a quality image. --Lvova 15:18, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose I agree with Lvova, very small DoF with only part of nose sharp. Eyes are not --Jakubhal 16:45, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline?   --Peulle 07:25, 9 October 2025 (UTC)

File:Shiva_Mahashivaratri_2025333.jpg

• Nomination Devotee in Lord SHiva attire --I.Mahesh 04:16, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Support Good job. --Harmonide 13:40, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose Technically not a quality image. --Lvova 15:18, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose Small DoF with small part sharp, noise --Jakubhal 16:49, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline?   --Peulle 07:25, 9 October 2025 (UTC)

File:Mahashivaratri_Varanasi_2025._56.jpg

• Nomination Shiva attire captured at Varanasi --I.Mahesh 04:16, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:41, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Support Impressive. --Harmonide 16:40, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose The same as above: impressive, yes, but technically not good. --Lvova 16:51, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose Unsharp, noise --Jakubhal 16:53, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → More votes?   --Peulle 07:25, 9 October 2025 (UTC)

File:Aqua_Pour_Homme_Eau_de_Toilette_is_a_fresh,_masculine_fragrance_designed_with_a_sleek_and_modern_aesthetic._01.jpg

• Nomination Aqua Pour Homme Eau de Toilette is a fresh, masculine fragrance designed with a sleek and modern aesthetic. This media has been uploaded as a part of Project Korikath --A S M Jobaer 18:32, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Oppose Writtings are blurred. --Sebring12Hrs 19:15, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Support OK for me. --Harmonide 12:37, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per Sebring12Hrs --Jakubhal 16:47, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline?   --Peulle 07:25, 9 October 2025 (UTC)

File:2025,_Kraków,_Ulica_Mikołajska_11_(1).jpg

• Nomination 2025, Kraków, Ulica Mikołajska 11 (1) --Igor123121 16:23, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 17:08, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose Another angle would have been better, I think. --Harmonide 12:37, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Support Another angle - another photo - another discussion. There is no need to compare, both this angle and another one can be QI. Lvova 15:16, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote?   --Peulle 07:25, 9 October 2025 (UTC)

File:People_on_the_Learning_day_of_CEEM_2025,_05.jpg

• Nomination Helga Vranos (Κommissarische Leiterin der Bibliothek) during the Learning day of CEEM 2025 --Lvova 07:08, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Support Good quality. Please add a {{Personality rights}} template to the file description. --AFBorchert 10:12, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose The bookshelf is tilted, it can be fixed. --Gower 16:23, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

•  Done Check now. --Lvova 16:42, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → More votes?   --Peulle 07:25, 9 October 2025 (UTC)

File:Pescadores_en_isla_Changuu,_Tanzania,_2024-05-31,_DD_21.jpg

• Nomination Fisher boat near Changuu Island, Tanzania --Poco a poco 06:18, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Oppose Blur --Dev Jadiya 07:39, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Comment Nice composition but ship is out of focus. --Gower 13:58, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

• @Gower: is it a support or an oppose? Lvova 15:13, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

•  Oppose I don't know, but for me it is an oppose. Per Dev Jadiya --Sebring12Hrs 22:09, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline?   --Peulle 07:25, 9 October 2025 (UTC)

File:Hermeskeil,_katholische_Pfarrkirche_Sankt_Martin_Dm_IMG_4776_2024-08-25_18.14.jpg

• Nomination Hermeskeil in Germany-RP, catolic church: Pfarrkirche Sankt Martin --Michielverbeek 05:06, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Support Good quality, but not very sharp (top of the tower) --Gower 18:40, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose A little bit distorted, a little bit unsharp, a little bit noisy. --Lvova 10:07, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → More votes?   --Peulle 07:25, 9 October 2025 (UTC)

File:Santa_Maria_del_Carmine,_Milan.jpg

• Nomination The Church of Santa Maria del Carmine, Milan --Julian Lupyan 23:33, 5 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose PC is needed. --Sebring12Hrs 11:23, 6 October 2025 (UTC)

• @Lmbuga Would you mind clarifying what PC stands for? I could not find it in Commons:Photography terms --Julian Lupyan 13:08, 6 October 2025 (UTC)

• perspective correction. Lvova 14:54, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
• @Julian Lupyan: , I will reply on your discussion page.--Lmbuga 11:54, 7 October 2025 (UTC)

•  Done @Sebring12Hrs: PC done + sharpened. Please let me know if I should change anything further --Julian Lupyan 22:41, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
• I think it has a chance in CR as far as the quthor tries to fix problems. --Lvova 10:00, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Decline?   --Peulle 07:25, 9 October 2025 (UTC)

• Discussion {{{2}}}

File:Chatham_Cenotaph,_Chatham,_Ontario,_2025-07-06_03.jpg

• Nomination Chatham Cenotaph, Chatham, Ontario, 2025-07-06 --Crisco 1492 14:18, 5 October 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Comment Nice photo, but I see what looks like a speck of dust near the sculpture's right elbow. --Vsatinet 14:52, 5 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Support Good quality, no doubt. --Harmonide 00:46, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose Until an answer to the question about that dot. --Lvova 09:58, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → More votes?   --Peulle 07:25, 9 October 2025 (UTC)

File:Tournus_-_Rue_du_Docteur_Privey_-_2.jpg

• Nomination Tournus (Saône-et-Loire, France) - Doctor Privey street --Benjism89 09:42, 4 October 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Oppose The blurred plate ruins the picture IMO. Could you do another try ? --Sebring12Hrs 20:29, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Support Good quality. --Harmonide 00:46, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose Nice composition, but I also think it's blurry. --Lvova 09:54, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose CA and burned out sky. --Gower 14:45, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Decline?   --Peulle 07:25, 9 October 2025 (UTC)

File:2025_Kraków,_Zespół_magazynów_artyleryjskich_Twierdzy_Kraków_(zbrojownia_twierdzy)_1.jpg

• Nomination 2025 Kraków, Zespół magazynów artyleryjskich Twierdzy Kraków (zbrojownia twierdzy) --Igor123121 06:59, 4 October 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
• Can jou create more space in the bottom? The trees are cut --Michielverbeek 07:22, 4 October 2025 (UTC)

• @Michielverbeek: Sorry, but I no longer have the original :( --Igor123121 06:04, 6 October 2025 (UTC)

•  Oppose As above, too little space at the bottom. --Gower 14:45, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

• unjustified - the photo shows the building, not the street and sidewalk --Igor123121 17:04, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Decline?   --Peulle 07:25, 9 October 2025 (UTC)

File:Grocery_store,_Dona_Estefânia_Street,_Lisbon,_Portugal_julesvernex2.jpg

• Nomination Grocery store, Dona Estefânia Street, Lisbon, Portugal (by Julesvernex2) --Sebring12Hrs 04:01, 4 October 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Oppose Too shadowy from the left and at the bottom. Main theme is not well exposed. --Gower 14:45, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

• As the file description suggests, this image shows a grocery store in Dona Estefânia, a traditional Lisbon street. Accordingly, the dappled light emphasises the groceries and traditional azulejos, while hiding away the fridge magnets and other touristy paraphernalia inside the store --Julesvernex2 15:08, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Decline?   --Peulle 07:25, 9 October 2025 (UTC)

File:Animals_of_Thessaloniki_07.jpg

• Nomination Sphingidae caterpillar in Thessaloniki. --Lvova 00:05, 4 October 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Oppose Mediocre quality and way of presentation of specimen. We have much better photos of that species. --Gower 18:40, 7 October 2025 (UTC)

• 'we have other photos' is not an argument here. --Lvova 09:49, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Decline?   --Peulle 07:25, 9 October 2025 (UTC)

File:Scholari_23.jpg

• Nomination A dog in Scholari --Lvova 00:05, 4 October 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Oppose Unacceptable perspective. --Gower 18:40, 7 October 2025 (UTC)

• I don't think so. --Lvova 09:49, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Decline?   --Peulle 07:25, 9 October 2025 (UTC)

File:Harbour,_Ribnitz-Damgarten_(LRM_20240511_132516).jpg

• Nomination Sailboats in the harbour of Ribnitz --MB-one 21:43, 3 October 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Oppose The Sky is really noisy. --Syntaxys 02:31, 4 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Support Good quality. --Harmonide 00:46, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Syntaxys. --Lvova 09:48, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline?   --Peulle 07:25, 9 October 2025 (UTC)

File:2024_Most_nad_Nysą_Kłodzką_w_Przyłęku_(09).jpg

• Nomination Bridge in Przyłęk 5 --Jacek Halicki 06:51, 3 October 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Support Good quality. --MB-one 13:03, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose Nice but bridge pillar is burned out --Gower 14:45, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → More votes?   --Peulle 07:25, 9 October 2025 (UTC)

File:Kościół_św._Tomasza,_Sosnowiec,_2025,_KsP_001.jpg

• Nomination Sosnowiec, Kościół św. Tomasza Apostoła w SosnowcuJa, właściciel praw autorskich do tego dzieła, udostępniam je na poniższej licencjiTa fotografia została przesłana w ramach projektu Wiki Lubi Zabytki będącego częścią inicjatywy Wiki Loves Monuments 2025. --KrzysztofPoplawski 17:12, 1 October 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
• PC is needed. --Sebring12Hrs 00:24, 2 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose It's also blurry on both sides and noisy. --Екатерина Борисова 03:39, 4 October 2025 (UTC)

•  Done Fixed version uploaded: PC corrected and some blurs and noises removed. --KrzysztofPoplawski 14:39, 6 October 2025 (UTC)

•  Support Oh, interesting. --Harmonide 00:32, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose Details washed out. Not very sharp. But yes, perspective is ok now. --Sebring12Hrs 17:10, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline?   --Peulle 07:25, 9 October 2025 (UTC)

File:Bazylika_Narodzenia_Najświętszej_Maryi_Panny_w_Gietrzwałdzie,_2025,_KsP_007.jpg

• Nomination Gietrzwałd, Bazylika Narodzenia Najświętszej Maryi Panny w GietrzwałdzieJa, właściciel praw autorskich do tego dzieła, udostępniam je na poniższej licencjiTa fotografia została przesłana w ramach projektu Wiki Lubi Zabytki będącego częścią inicjatywy Wiki Loves Monuments 2025. --KrzysztofPoplawski 17:12, 1 October 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
• PC is needed. --Sebring12Hrs 00:23, 2 October 2025 (UTC)

• PC  Done --KrzysztofPoplawski 07:36, 5 October 2025 (UTC)

•  Support Good quality. --AFBorchert 10:06, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose Purple CAs at left on the tree trunks. --Sebring12Hrs 17:11, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

• You are right, I overlooked that. @KrzysztofPoplawski: could you fix the CAs? --AFBorchert 09:29, 9 October 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → More votes?   --Peulle 07:34, 9 October 2025 (UTC)

File:20250502_Vienna_02.jpg

• Nomination View up the courtyard of the Paltisches Haus at the Himmelpfortgasse 15 in Vienna, Austria --FlocciNivis 16:03, 1 October 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
• pls remove those dust specks --Virtual-Pano 17:20, 1 October 2025 (UTC)

•  Done --FlocciNivis 14:32, 4 October 2025 (UTC)

•  Comment there are still two spots just to the right of the centre Virtual-Pano 20:24, 5 October 2025 (UTC)

•  Done, did I get all of them this time? Otherwise I'll give up... --FlocciNivis 17:30, 7 October 2025 (UTC)

•  Support Interesting perspective and nice blue. --Harmonide 00:32, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose Dust spots on the walls. --Sebring12Hrs 17:08, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → More votes?   --Peulle 07:34, 9 October 2025 (UTC)

File:Kazan_Peter_and_Paul_Cathedral_Bell_Tower_Колокольня_Казанского_Петропавловского_собора.jpg

• Nomination Kazan Peter and Paul Cathedral Bell Tower--AlixSaz 18:57, 30 September 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
• Dust spots. --Sebring12Hrs 00:21, 2 October 2025 (UTC)

•  Done Thank you. I have eliminated the dust stains --AlixSaz 14:55, 2 October 2025 (UTC)

•  Support Superb. --Harmonide 00:04, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose Clean now, but top is blurred and bottom too. It needs to be discussed IMO. Sorry. --Sebring12Hrs 17:08, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → More votes?   --Peulle 07:34, 9 October 2025 (UTC)

File:Naris_Crkva_svetog_Marka,_Beograd_(St._Mark's_Church,_Belgrade).jpg

• Nomination St. Marks church in Belgrade, Serbia --PetarM 17:01, 30 September 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Oppose needs PC --FlocciNivis 19:13, 30 September 2025 (UTC)

• @FlocciNivis when drone is too high, doing PD in nonsense. Or you can try to show, and you will see problem. --PetarM 16:37, 4 October 2025 (UTC)

•  Support Nice view! --Harmonide 00:04, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose Yes may be it needs PC. --Sebring12Hrs 17:06, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline?   --Peulle 07:34, 9 October 2025 (UTC)

File:O3_Business_Campus,_Opolska_Street,_Kraków,_Poland.jpg

• Nomination O3 Business Campus, Opolska Street, Kraków, Poland --Igor123121 05:11, 29 September 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Comment Perspective distortion --Jakubhal 05:34, 29 September 2025 (UTC)

• @Jakubhal:  Done --Igor123121 06:23, 6 October 2025 (UTC)

•  Support Good quality. --Harmonide 00:22, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose Sorry, but there is still a problem, buildings on the sides are leaning --Jakubhal 18:07, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → More votes?   --Peulle 07:34, 9 October 2025 (UTC)

File:Balloon_Cup_2025_-_AMX_International_(51-34).jpg

• Nomination AMX International (51-34) of the 51st Wing at the second edition of the Balloon Cup, Piacenza-San Damiano airport, September 2025 --Hotolmo22 16:05, 28 September 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
• The horizon is slightly tilted. --Lvova 20:55, 2 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Support Good! --Harmonide 00:04, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose As it said. --Lvova 09:42, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → More votes?   --Peulle 07:34, 9 October 2025 (UTC)

File:V-P_08618_GER_Muenster_Lamberti_church_with_Himmelsleiter_seen_from_Prinzipalmarkt.jpg

• Nomination Prinzipalmarkt and St Lamberti with light installation 'Himmelsleiter' --Virtual-Pano 08:06, 28 September 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
• Please remove the white line at the top edge and the sky is a bit noisy, other ok. --Sebring12Hrs 19:52, 5 October 2025 (UTC)

•  Done thx - for the hint Virtual-Pano 23:12, 5 October 2025 (UTC)

• Ok for the white line, but the sky is posterized now. Sorry. --Sebring12Hrs 22:11, 7 October 2025 (UTC)

•  Support Interesting shot. Almost magical. --Harmonide 00:04, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose Don't cancel my vote. --Sebring12Hrs 17:05, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → More votes?   --Peulle 07:34, 9 October 2025 (UTC)

File:Great_northern_diver_(Gavia_immer)_immature_Kaldbakstjarnir.jpg

• Nomination Great northern diver (Gavia immer) immature --Charlesjsharp 08:53, 27 September 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
• The bird appears to be a bit noisy --MB-one 16:02, 29 September 2025 (UTC)
•  Support Good quality. --Harmonide 00:04, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose I disagree per above. --MB-one 06:51, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose Texture of bird is very unnatural. --Gower 14:45, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline?   --Peulle 07:34, 9 October 2025 (UTC)

File:Hamburg_Mergellstr_7.jpg

• Nomination Hamburg-Harburg, residential building Mergellstrasse 7 --KaiBorgeest 21:37, 24 September 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Oppose The cut car is disturbing. --Sebring12Hrs 22:37, 30 September 2025 (UTC)
•  Support OK. --Harmonide 00:22, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose I disagree. Burnt sky. --Smial 09:17, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline?   --Peulle 07:34, 9 October 2025 (UTC)

File:Medicinal_herbs_from_Essaouira.jpg

• Nomination Medicinal herbs from Essaouira --User:Mounir Neddi 18:18, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Oppose Nice photo, but not very sharp. --Gower 17:46, 7 October 2025 (UTC)

  It was just a comment, but formatted as Oppose by Peulle. Lvova 10:47, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

•  Oppose Per above. Not sharp enough --Jakubhal 03:56, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

 Question Why is this here, with neither supporting votes nor objections from the nominator?--Peulle 10:18, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

• Because Gower decided to send every his comment to discussion, and you just changed his comments to oppose without any mentioning of it. We already spoke with you about it - you should not make people guess that you formatted the vote. Add your comment when you do such things. Lvova 10:47, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

• No, I don't want to write that every single time, adding extra work to the workload. Also, asking the commenter whether they meant to comment or oppose adds time to the discussion. The rules say that an oppose vote is assumed from the objection if an image is sent to CR. If it were otherwise, any objection could be overruled by the nominator's sending the image to CR. I can show you what I mean: there is a photo in CR right now. One user made a comment on it, then the author made a change and sent it to CR, and another user voted support. If the first user's comment is not registered as an oppose, the image will be promoted whether the first user agrees or not. What if they meant to oppose? And then they spend a few days on holiday and don't check Commons? Now CR has ignored their vote. Therefore, it is better to assume they mean to oppose, and we will need another person to vote support as well - in which case the opposing vote will be outvoted anyway. Setting the oppose is not meant to dictate what a person meant to do - it is a formal procedure meant to prevent images from being promoted summarily without discussion. :) --Peulle 07:46, 9 October 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline?   --Peulle 10:18, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

File:Handicrafts_Products_(Carpets)_from_Essaouira_(ancienne_Mogador).jpg

• Nomination Handicrafts Products (Carpets) from Essaouira --User:Mounir Neddi 18:18, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Oppose Nice photo, but rugs partially blurred, out of focus. --Gower 17:46, 7 October 2025 (UTC)

  It was just a comment, now formatted as an implicite oppose by Peulle, who forgets to make such notes. Lvova 10:49, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

•  Oppose Per Gower, items for sale are blurred. But decline directly, don't send it to CR. --Sebring12Hrs 19:11, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose Same points. -- Harmonide 13:30, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Decline?   --Lvova 14:48, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

File:Ourense_cathedral_2021_-_south_façade.jpg

• Nomination Ourense cathedral 2021 - south façade. By User:Fernando --Lmbuga 16:38, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Support Good quality. --Igor123121 16:40, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose Good photo but maybe different cropping (on the right are unnecessary details) --Gower 17:46, 7 October 2025 (UTC)

  It was just a comment, now formatted as an implicite oppose by Peulle, who forgets to make such notes. Lvova 10:49, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

•  Weak support OK, but could be better, as Gower pointed out. -- Harmonide 13:29, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote?   --Lvova 14:47, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

File:2025,_Kraków,_Ulica_Mikołajska_12_(1).jpg

• Nomination 2025, Kraków, Ulica Mikołajska 12 (1) --Igor123121 16:23, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 17:08, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose Nice photo, but parallel to wall, frontal perspective would be better. --Gower 17:46, 7 October 2025 (UTC)

• @Gower: I’m aware of that, but I’d rather not change the perspective so drastically in the program, as it would distort the natural look of the photo. I think that although it’s not perfect in its current form, it still meets the requirements of Quality images. --Igor123121 18:06, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
• It was just a comment, now formatted as an implicit oppose by Peulle, who forgets to make such notes. Lvova 10:50, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

•  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 18:19, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose It doesn't work for me, sorry. I don't see what the main point of the picture is supposed to be. -- Harmonide 13:27, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

  In QI we don’t assess whether the photo will be useful for something, only whether it is technically correct. Igor123121 14:41, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

•  Support Good quality. Lvova 14:46, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Support Good image Юрий Д.К. 20:52, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Promote?   --Lvova 14:46, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

File:2025,_Kraków,_Ulica_Mikołajska_14_(2).jpg

• Nomination 2025, Kraków, Ulica Mikołajska 14 (2) --Igor123121 16:23, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 17:08, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose Nice photo, but parallel to window, frontal perspective would be better. --Gower 17:46, 7 October 2025 (UTC)

• @Gower: I’m aware of that, but I’d rather not change the perspective so drastically in the program, as it would distort the natural look of the photo. I think that although it’s not perfect in its current form, it still meets the requirements of Quality images. --Igor123121 18:06, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
• It was just a comment, now formatted as an implicit oppose by Peulle, who forgets to make such notes. Lvova 10:50, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

•  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 18:21, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose I agree with Gower. Something is off for me. -- Harmonide 13:22, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• A photo can always be better, though in my opinion this one is sufficient for QI. I don’t intend to change the perspective in the program because it would distort the image too much. Igor123121 14:45, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → More votes?   --Lvova 14:45, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

File:20250706_Gallotia_galloti_01.jpg

• Nomination A Tenerife Lizard in the Parque del Drago in Icod de los Vinos, Tenerife, Spain --FlocciNivis 15:47, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Oppose Tail cut, head not sharp. Not very good. --Gower 18:40, 7 October 2025 (UTC)

  I fixed the crop so that the tail is included completly. And I disagree that the head is not sharp and ask for other opinions --FlocciNivis 20:21, 7 October 2025 (UTC)

•  Weak oppose The head is just sharp enough for me, but too confined in the right corner. Other opinions? --Harmonide 14:11, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline?   --Lvova 14:44, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

File:Kazans_Bogoroditsky_Monastery_2024-07-13_1488.jpg

• Nomination Kazans Bogoroditsky Monastery --Mike1979 Russia 07:01, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Oppose Blur and overprocessed --Dev Jadiya 07:22, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Support Not so blurred to me. --Sebring12Hrs 19:17, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose Agree, this is not sharp enough. Lvova 08:42, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• Sharpness increased, saturation decreased. --Mike1979 Russia 10:04, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Weak oppose Too cropped on the ground, sadly. -- Harmonide 13:19, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Decline?   --Lvova 14:44, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

File:Петергоф,_Нижний_парк,_Оранжерейный_сад,_гортензия_02.jpg

• Nomination Hydrangea in Orangery Garden of Lower Park, Peterhof, Saint Petersburg, Russia. --Екатерина Борисова 03:00, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Oppose Blur --Dev Jadiya 07:30, 7 October 2025 (UTC)

  Maybe sharpness is not perfect here, but the image is obviuosly not blurry. So I'd like to hear other opinions. --Екатерина Борисова 02:28, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

•  Support I wasn't sure about my vote because of DoF, but it is not blurred. Lvova 08:44, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Support I find it OK. -- Harmonide 13:41, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote?   --Lvova 14:43, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

File:20250706_Calle_San_Agustín_03.jpg

• Nomination The wooden door of the building at the Calle San Agustín 47 in Icod de los Vinos, Tenerife --FlocciNivis 10:02, 5 October 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
• Good, but vertical line (wall) of the left is a bit leaning --Lmbuga 10:27, 5 October 2025 (UTC)

   Done --FlocciNivis 17:22, 7 October 2025 (UTC)

•  Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 00:15, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose Stil a bit wonky to my eyes. --Harmonide 00:46, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → More votes?   --Lvova 09:38, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

File:NW_Night_Roma_Tiburtina_Italy_Sep23_A7C_07958.jpg

• Nomination Roma Tiburtina Station at night, view from northwest, Italy --Tagooty 04:11, 5 October 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:37, 5 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose Color noise, PC not done and not very sharp. --Sebring12Hrs 20:37, 7 October 2025 (UTC)

  @Sebring12Hrs: Thanks for the review. Please see the new version with PC and NR. --Tagooty 03:09, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

•  Support I find it quite remarkable, indeed. -- Harmonide 13:17, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose sorry, but I agree with Sebring12Hrs even for the new version. Lvova 14:42, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → More votes?   --Lvova 14:42, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

File:West_AB-13_AB-11_IIT_Gandhinagar_Sep25_A7CR_07893.jpg

• Nomination West facade, Academic Blocks AB-13 and AB-11, IIT Gandhinagar, Gujarat, India --Tagooty 14:15, 29 September 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Oppose Excessive perspective correction. Not acceptable --Dev Jadiya 07:17, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Support I disagree. --Sebring12Hrs 22:10, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Support Good quality. -- Harmonide 13:47, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Support Comparing the view with File:SW AB-13 IIT Gandhinagar Gujarat Sep25 A7CR 07891.jpg, I do not think that the perspective correction is excessive. The tapering of the balcony is correct, for instance. --Harlock81 19:09, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote?   --Harlock81 19:09, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

File:UlicaPapierniPrądnickich-TorowiskoTramwajowe-PrądnikBiały-POL,_Kraków.jpg

• Nomination UlicaPapierniPrądnickich-TorowiskoTramwajowe-PrądnikBiały-POL, Kraków --Igor123121 05:11, 29 September 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Support Good quality. --Dev Jadiya 07:11, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose Perspective distortion should be fixed --Jakubhal 07:18, 7 October 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → More votes?   --Peulle 10:40, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

File:Outdoor_sculpture_"Owieczki",_1968_design._Bronisław_Chromy,_University_of_Agriculture_Faculty_of_Animal_Sciences,_24-28_Mickiewicza_Alley,_Kraków,_Poland.jpg

• Nomination Outdoor sculpture "Owieczki", 1968 design. Bronisław Chromy, University of Agriculture Faculty of Animal Sciences, 24-28 Mickiewicza Alley, Kraków, Poland --Igor123121 17:43, 25 September 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
• A little bit unlucky composition in the center because of a bright pants behind the sheep. --Lvova 20:32, 2 October 2025 (UTC)

  @Lvova:  Done? --Igor123121 06:23, 6 October 2025 (UTC)

•  Support Good quality. --Harmonide 00:04, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose @Harmonide: Please do not vote on top of the previous review until the dialogue is over, this is not very polite. As for me I don't think that these legs in red trousers that are still visible decorates the image, sorry. --Екатерина Борисова 02:57, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

  Well, more opinions - a good idea, because I agree with you, but not sure if my vote is oppose because of it. Lvova 09:34, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

  Sorry, Екатерина Борисова, I don't understand your point about my vote. Yesterday night was the first time I voted for Quality Images, so I did what I could based on what I understood. How should I have done it more properly? Harmonide 11:38, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

  The common sense is taking a look for a while and then the participating; you started to be very active without observation how it works, so do a little mess. As she wrote you, it's unpolite to vote when someone mentioned a problem and didn't accept a solution. Also, you use /discussions instead of /comments and put comments in CR in a little bit random place. Everything is fixable, but can be better if to be a little bit more attentive to what others do. Lvova 14:40, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

•  Weak oppose The sculptures are well taken, but the crop at the top is quite tight. --Harlock81 19:02, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Support The red pants are not obtrusive--KaiBorgeest 22:18, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → More votes?   ----KaiBorgeest 22:18, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

File:20240514_Völklingen_Ironworks_04.jpg

• Nomination The artwork Defund the War Machine by Roadsworth on a roof in the Völklingen Ironworks --FlocciNivis 16:12, 25 September 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
• I think this tries to capture too much in one image, so neither the artwork nor the ironworks are high quality. --Tagooty 03:46, 30 September 2025 (UTC)
•  Support There's something I like in this picture even if it's not perfect. It's quite immersive, it creates an atmosphere. It says something about the place. So not a remarkable shot, but a quality one in my eyes. --Harmonide 00:22, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose As explained in my comments above. --Tagooty 03:01, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → More votes?   --Lvova 09:35, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

File:Дом_Куренковых_The_Kurenkovs'_House_IMG_6364.jpg

• Nomination Kurenkov House: 33 Abelman Street, Kovrov, Vladimir region. Kovrov Historical and Memorial Museum, Kovrov Museum - the city of military glory.--AlixSaz 08:30, 25 September 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
• PC is needed. Check the verticals please. --Sebring12Hrs 12:32, 28 September 2025 (UTC)

•  Done Ok! Made correct perspective--AlixSaz 03:37, 1 October 2025 (UTC)

• Verticals are vertical, but the building looks distorted with weird proportions --Екатерина Борисова 03:49, 6 October 2025 (UTC)

•  Oppose Nothing changed, you didn't uploade a new version. --Sebring12Hrs 08:02, 6 October 2025 (UTC)

•  Done Sorry. There was a misunderstanding. I have uploaded the corrected files now. Unfortunately, the narrow streets of the city do not allow you to take a better photo. --AlixSaz 06:28, 7 October 2025 (UTC)

• I think this case needs a discussion. --Екатерина Борисова 02:52, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Decline?   --Peulle 07:40, 9 October 2025 (UTC)

File:Spanish_iris_(Iris_xiphium),_Jardim_da_Fundação_Calouste_Gulbenkian,_Lisbon,_Portugal_julesvernex2.jpg

• Nomination Spanish iris (Iris xiphium), Jardim da Fundação Calouste Gulbenkian, Lisbon, Portugal (by Julesvernex2) --Sebring12Hrs 16:18, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Oppose Composition doesn't expose that flower well, bad cropping. --Gower 17:59, 6 October 2025 (UTC)

• I disagree. The flower is well exposed, and the sharpness is good. --Sebring12Hrs 20:33, 6 October 2025 (UTC)

•  Support Good quality, clear QI, although it could be improved with some cropping, in my opinion.--Lmbuga 13:46, 7 October 2025 (UTC)

• I used a rule of thirds crop to create lead room in front of the leaning flower. Also tried a centered composition but it looked less balanced to my eyes --Julesvernex2 14:50, 7 October 2025 (UTC)

I understand, and whatever decision you make deserves respect.--Lmbuga 00:20, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

• I agree that this is not the best crop but colors and sharpness are amazing, so I  Support Юрий Д.К. 16:34, 7 October 2025 (UTC)

•  Weak support The composition is controversial, but the quality is very good. -- Екатерина Борисова 03:01, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Support Good quality. -- Harmonide 12:23, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Comment Everyone, thank you for the feedback on this image's composition. I had another go at experimenting with various crops: while I didn't find an alternative I personally liked more, I did find that removing the background stem created a better balance between the flower and the negative space to its right. I've added the relevant template and categories to document this manipulation. Since this is a material change, pinging the nominator and supporting reviewers: Pinging @Sebring12Hrs, Lmbuga, Юрий Д.К., Екатерина Борисова, Harmonide --Julesvernex2 (talk) 15:43, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote?   --Lvova 14:34, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

File:2025_Kraków,_Królewska_5,_Józefitów.jpg

• Nomination 2025 Kraków, Królewska 5, Józefitów --Igor123121 15:56, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
• Wrong perspective correction, walls lines aren't parallel. --Gower 17:59, 6 October 2025 (UTC)

  @Gower:  Done :) --Igor123121 18:46, 6 October 2025 (UTC)

•  Support Good quality -- Spurzem 18:39, 7 October 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promote?   --Lvova 10:52, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

File:2025,_Kraków,_Kamienica_Czerwona_w_Krakowie.jpg

• Nomination 2025, Kraków, Kamienica Czerwona w Krakowie --Igor123121 15:56, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
• Needs to be straightened. --Gower 17:59, 6 October 2025 (UTC)

  @Gower:  Done :) --Igor123121 18:46, 6 October 2025 (UTC)

•  Support Good quality -- Spurzem 18:38, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Weak oppose The exposure isn't very good to my eyes, and the guy's foot is cropped in the foreground. I'm not convinced on this one. Could easily be better. -- Harmonide (talk) 12:21, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → More votes?   --Lvova 14:33, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

File:CEEM_2025,_Первый_день_(17).jpg

• Nomination Konstantinos Stampoulis. First day of Wikimedia CEE Meeting 2025. --Красный 08:25, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Support Good quality. --A S M Jobaer 10:25, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose Too strong noise --Jakubhal 11:53, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per Jakubhal. --Sebring12Hrs 19:18, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per Jakubhal.--Lmbuga 00:26, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Decline?   --Peulle 10:51, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

File:CEEM_2025,_Первый_день_(29).jpg

• Nomination Maciej Nadzikiewicz. First day of Wikimedia CEE Meeting 2025. --Красный 08:25, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Support Good quality. --A S M Jobaer 10:25, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose Not sharp enough --Jakubhal 11:53, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose Completly blurred. --Sebring12Hrs 19:23, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per Sebring12Hrs--Lmbuga 00:28, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Decline?   --Lvova 08:36, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

File:Prunes_et_Peches_-_Pierre_Dupuys.jpg

• Nomination Prunes et Peches - Pierre Dupuys --GoldenArtists 07:47, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 08:52, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose Not fully straight, reflections on the surface of canvas. --Gower 17:59, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Support I improved it a little bit. For me it is good now. -- Spurzem 18:35, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Weak support Can we remove the purple wall around the frame? -- Harmonide 12:18, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote?   --Lvova 14:33, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

File:Thessaloniki_views_10.jpg

• Nomination A view of Thessaloniki from Pyrgos Aliseos --Lvova 00:09, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
• Decline
•  Oppose It needs slight perspective correction: Vertical line of the right of the white house on the right is leaning --Lmbuga 02:51, 6 October 2025 (UTC)

  The surface is not horizontal. --Lvova 08:22, 6 October 2025 (UTC)

•  Oppose I agree, PC is needed, look at the verticals, sorry to oppose. --Sebring12Hrs 11:24, 6 October 2025 (UTC)

Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 07:37, 9 October 2025 (UTC)

File:Дом_Куренковых_The_Kurenkovs'_House_IMG_6367.jpg

• Nomination Kurenkov House: 33 Abelman Street, Kovrov, Vladimir region. Kovrov Historical and Memorial Museum, Kovrov Museum - the city of military glory.--AlixSaz 08:30, 25 September 2025(UTC)
• Discussion
• PC is needed. Check the verticals please. --Sebring12Hrs 12:32, 28 September 2025 (UTC)

   Done Ok! Made correct perspective--AlixSaz 03:37, 1 October 2025 (UTC)

•  Support Good quality now IMO --Екатерина Борисова 03:47, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose Nothing changed, you didn't uploade a new version. --Sebring12Hrs 08:02, 6 October 2025 (UTC)

   Done Sorry. There was a misunderstanding. I have uploaded the corrected files now. Unfortunately, the narrow streets of the city do not allow you to take a better photo. --AlixSaz 06:28, 7 October 2025 (UTC)

•  Oppose Vertical lines of the building on the ride side are not straight--Lmbuga 00:36, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline?   --Lvova 08:34, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

File:Panteón,_París,_Francia,_2022-10-29,_DD_63.jpg

• Nomination Panteón, París, Francia, 2022-10-29 (by Poco a poco) --Sebring12Hrs 17:52, 5 October 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 21:29, 5 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose Not sharp, sorry. In addition, if it is impossible to avoid people getting into the frame near popular buildings, then at least they should look natural, and here many people are distorted. --Екатерина Борисова 03:14, 6 October 2025 (UTC)

  @Екатерина Борисова: You're right, but in some cases it's best to get used to that distortion and accept that it's inevitable. The building is perfect and the position of the sun is amazing. I am also surprised by the position of the sun and the brightness and clarity of the building.--Lmbuga 13:01, 6 October 2025 (UTC)

  @Lmbuga: I'm not suggesting deleting this photo from the Commons. If a photo doesn't get a QI status, it doesn't disappear anywhere, it just doesn't get a QI status. You can use it and even consider it beautiful :) But I think it's very unsharp, especially in the shadows, and that's the main point why it's not a QI in my eyes. -- Екатерина Борисова 03:53, 7 October 2025 (UTC)

  I see some noise in darker areas, but I definitely don't agree with the stamentent that "it's very unsharp", specially if you consider that I'm offering 48 MPx of resolution. --Poco a poco 06:28, 7 October 2025 (UTC)

•  Oppose I saw so many pictures of the same building that were so much better. It's not a complimentary picture to my eyes. -- Harmonide 12:12, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose I don't think this perspective warp works here, especially with all those leaning people.--Peulle 07:37, 9 October 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Decline?   --Lvova 14:32, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

File:Amphithéâtre_vue_aerienne_1.jpg

• Nomination 53-3 in Tunisia.I, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license:This image was uploaded as part of Wiki Loves Monuments 2025. By User:Skander zarrad --Houss 2020 09:34, 5 October 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Support Good quality, but it's kind of cheating for me - more than 5 images of one user nominated in a row. So especially if you want to flood this page, USE the nominating SCRIPT, please. Lvova 18:53, 5 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose Very good, perhaps FP, but I think the image needs a slight perspective correction.--Lmbuga 21:14, 5 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Support Impressive -- Spurzem 16:38, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Support What a view. I agree to promote it. -- Harmonide 11:41, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote?   --Lvova 14:32, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

File:Thessaloniki_views_07.jpg

• Nomination A view of Thessaloniki from Pyrgos Aliseos --Lvova 08:06, 5 October 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
• I like the picture, but it needs a slight perspective correction. Look at the white house on the right. --Lmbuga 09:15, 5 October 2025 (UTC)

  As far as I see, it is straight?.. --Lvova 09:21, 5 October 2025 (UTC)

  If you wish, I can try to improve it; but if I do, I should not promote it. Should be easy--Lmbuga 23:27, 5 October 2025 (UTC)

  Look at the vertical line on the right side of the white house's façade. --Lmbuga 23:30, 5 October 2025 (UTC)

  Now I see - earlier I checked the left side, since it's more visible. But in my opinion, correcting such a small angle is a PC extremism :( --Lvova 00:19, 6 October 2025 (UTC)

   Oppose It seems we cannot agree. It is best for you that I oppose it because of what has been said, not that I let it be. I myself propose CR. We have colleagues who help. --Lmbuga 00:52, 6 October 2025 (UTC)

•  Oppose Per Lmbuga, sorry. --Sebring12Hrs 22:14, 7 October 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline?   --Lvova 08:31, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

File:The_Coin_Harvey_House.jpg

• Nomination The Harvey House, also known as the "Coin" Harvey House, is a historic home located at Huntington, Cabell County, West Virginia. It was built in 1874 and is a two-story dwelling reminiscent of houses in New Orleans. It features stained glass windows, a cast-iron mantel, and a beamed ceiling in the dining room. It is most notable as the home of William Hope "Coin" Harvey (1851 – 1936).I, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license: --Fdy3k 20:38, 4 October 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
• Too noisy as it is. Probably can be improved. --Plozessor 03:02, 5 October 2025 (UTC)

  Thanks. I applied denoise in a new version. --Fdy3k 13:18, 5 October 2025 (UTC)

  I meant to use the “comment” category instead of “discuss”. --Fdy3k 18:24, 5 October 2025 (UTC)

•  Oppose Sorry. I'm sorry, but I can't tell what the anomaly is at the top edge of the building or on the bird's head there (posterisation?). The top part has too much noise, enough to make the detail somewhat poor. The perspective needs to be corrected. Green CAs are clearly visible in the lower area, especially at the edge with the floor tiles from outside the property. --Lmbuga 00:13, 6 October 2025 (UTC)

  I take back what I said about needing perspective correction, although the tilt on the left side could be improved, but it's very minor, very insignificant. --Lmbuga 00:47, 6 October 2025 (UTC)

  Thank you. I make edits to address CA. --Fdy3k 00:17, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

•  Oppose Why did you reduce exposure? IMO it's clearly too dark now. Plus, there' still a lot of noise especially in the upper part and in the dark areas (check the "1874" sign near the top). --Plozessor 03:44, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Weak oppose Tilted and too dark for me. That's a pity. -- Harmonide 12:09, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• I undid the exposure change, adjusted the denoise, and slightly tilted the alignment. Thanks for the feedback. --Fdy3k 22:27, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Decline?   --Lvova 14:31, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

File:Саборна_црква_у_Београду_(Belgrade_Cathedral_Church,_Serbia).jpg

• Nomination St. Michael's Cathedral (Belgrade Cathedral Church), Belgrade --PetarM 10:15, 30 September 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Support Good quality. --Romzig 10:23, 4 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose Isn't there a need for perspective correction here? Also right crop is not good IMO. --Екатерина Борисова 03:40, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per Екатерина Борисова. --Sebring12Hrs 00:36, 7 October 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline?   --Lvova 08:28, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

File:2024_Dom_czeladny_w_Podtyniu_(5).jpg

• Nomination Servants' house in Podtynie 3 by User:Jacek Halicki --Boston9
• Discussion
   Oppose The main object isn't focused, the sky is too bright. --Lvova 20:38, 2 October 2025 (UTC)
  I disagree, please discussion --Jacek Halicki 10:47, 3 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Neutral The photo is sharp enough, but the sky and the roof of the outbuilding are too bright. I also would have placed the main subject deeper into the frame. All in all, the photo isn't bad, but in my opinion, it's not one that deserves to be recognized as a quality image. -- Spurzem 09:32, 5 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Support Not so bad to me. --Sebring12Hrs 00:38, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Support When I first reviewed it, I was about to promote it. I didn't do so because I was convinced that it was going to be a controversial promotion. It doesn't look burnt to me. The detail and everything else is good. I don't think it's very pretty, but QI pictures don't have to be pretty.--Lmbuga 00:58, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose Sky is burnt out, same for small parts of the metal roof. The (more or less) dark building in front of the bright white sky just isn't looking good. --Plozessor 03:48, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → More votes?   --Plozessor 03:48, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

File:Петергоф,_партер,_фонтан_Нимфа_05.jpg

• Nomination Mascaron of Nymph fountain, Lower Park of Peterhof, Saint Petersburg, Russia. --Екатерина Борисова 03:02, 25 September 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Oppose Weak sharpness. --Sebring12Hrs 23:44, 1 October 2025 (UTC)

  I don't think that the sharpness is ideal here, but IMO it's better than in the one you supported as "very good". It creates the impression that you approach different participants with different standards. So I'd like to hear other opinions - just for better understanding of the situation. --Екатерина Борисова 03:58, 3 October 2025 (UTC)

  I think the picture you mentioned is a mistake by myself, it was not very good in terms of sharpness, my bad. --Sebring12Hrs 17:31, 5 October 2025 (UTC)

  OK. I'm not going to fight with you, I was just very surprised at that time. -- Екатерина Борисова 03:59, 7 October 2025 (UTC)

•  Comment Sharpness is fine for me. The foliage on the left is rather noisy, NR will help. --Tagooty 09:23, 4 October 2025 (UTC)

•  Oppose Sharpness is ok, but there's too much noise (and artifacts from the camera's noise reduction, probably also from JPG compression), especially in the shadows.

   Info Invalid vote stricken. Please sign your votes! --Robert Flogaus-Faust 13:57, 4 October 2025 (UTC)

  Oops!  Oppose. --Plozessor 03:08, 5 October 2025 (UTC)

  @Plozessor: I'm not going to argue, because for some reason I don't see the noise very well. Some kind of feature of my vision maybe. However, please make notes on artifacts, I want to understand exactly what you mean. -- Екатерина Борисова 03:47, 5 October 2025 (UTC)

• @Екатерина Борисова: Here's a part of your photo at 200 %: [https://ibb.co/MD32xSj9]. These are artifacts, most probably caused by your camera's noise reduction. --Plozessor 03:04, 6 October 2025 (UTC)

• I see now, thanks a lot. -- Екатерина Борисова 04:00, 6 October 2025 (UTC)

•  Oppose Artefacts especially on the edges and very abundant in shaded areas.--Lmbuga 02:24, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Support I'm quite surprised by the votes here. It's not a remarkable image, but I wouldn't deny it to be of quality. Maybe I'm not picky enough, but I find it quite OK. -- Harmonide 12:06, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Decline?   --Lvova 14:31, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

File:Norderney,_Strand,_Sonnenuntergang_--_2025_--_9241.jpg

• Nomination Sunset on the beach, Norderney, Lower Saxony, Germany --XRay 04:21, 1 October 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 04:38, 1 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose Competent image but this sunset image hasl insufficient value per QI guidelines to merit rating. --GRDN711 05:11, 1 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Weak support I would have preferred a greater DoF, but I still consider this photo QI. This is not a matter of anyone’s questionable and highly subjective judgment of whether the photo has value or not --Jakubhal 05:30, 1 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Comment It is a mystery to me how the value of a photo can be measured (also in relation to the QI guidelines). Until now, I have always rated photos based on their quality. --XRay 06:45, 1 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Comment QI is purely about the technical quality of images, not about their value. --Plozessor 08:12, 2 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Weak support per Jakubhal. --Smial 10:24, 3 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Comment @Smial: @Jakubhal: @Uoaei1: @XRay: @Plozessor: Reading through the seven QI evaluation guidelines above, some list requirements for documentation; others about aspects of technical quality and then there is the final 7th.
  

“Value

Our main goal is to encourage quality images being contributed to Wikicommons, valuable for Wikimedia and other projects.”

When I look at this image, I see a pile of (?) on a beach in front of a palid sunset. I personally think the pile is bull kelp (nereocystis luetkeana) but it is not identified as such. The beach could be anywhere (no distinction), as is the pale sunset.

Some of the QI quality attributes have characteristics that can be accurately described, But when it comes to the QI guidelines, none are measured. There is an element of subjectivity in every evaluation that works out in the consensus judgment of the reviewers.

Guideline 7 on QI Value affirms that on achieveing a QI rating, this image should the potential to be useful in the Wikipedia online encyclopedia and its derivatives. In most nominated images, the QI value is inherent in the image or from the description. IMO, as a personal picture, this image is fine, but per Guideline 7 how or where would this image find utility in Wikipedia? I just can’t see it. That is the basis of my oppose. --GRDN711 15:53, 5 October 2025 (UTC)

Unfortunately, I don't understand why everything is always reduced to Wikipedia. To be honest, I find it frustrating. There are many more Wikimedia projects and a wide range of possible applications. --XRay 05:09, 6 October 2025 (UTC)

@GRDN711: Your interpretation of the QI "value" guideline is far too narrow. Its purpose is to avoid promoting genuinely non-encyclopedic content such as random personal snapshots or selfies, not to exclude entire subjects like sunsets, wilted flowers, or beaches based on personal notions of significance. QI focuses primarily on technical quality, and your approach takes the value criterion to an extreme not supported by the guidelines or community practice. If you continue provoking such discussions, the community may eventually seek outside help to address your case. --Jakubhal 05:11, 6 October 2025 (UTC)

@GRDN711: Since the entire QI project is dedicated to technical quality, all that you can read in the Guideline relate to the technical quality of the photos, not their content. Obviously, it's much more convenient and correct to illustrate Wiki projects with good-quality images than with bad ones, and that's exactly the point. As for the "potential to be useful" of the contents of the pictures, no one can predict what will benefit and when, and what won't, and neither can you if your real name isn't Nostradamus. That is why all your arguments about the contents of the images here in this project are absolutely incorrect. -- Екатерина Борисова 04:11, 7 October 2025 (UTC)

•  Support I don't understand your point GRDN711. This image could be used to illustrate an article about algaes in Norway... --Sebring12Hrs 19:47, 5 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Support I find it quite fine too. -- Harmonide 11:57, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Comment to All: Please take the time to read the QI guidelines above. Almost without exception, anyone can upload any image of their choice. However, when the extra step is taken to nominate that image to be rated as a quality image, there are 7 guidelines that are intended to be met through review. These QI criteria cover three areas – documentation (1, 2), technical (3 – 6) and value (7) to the Wikipedia online encyclopedia and/or its member Wikis. There is more to a QI rating than just technical.
  

This QI rating system is not run for uses that no one can predict; or for use in some school project or outside publication. The stated intention of adding a QI rating to an image to distinguish that the image has potential to be useful to the Wikis.

Everyone at this forum has an opinion, and every opinion is both valid and subjective, be it about QI documentation, technical or value. We rely on the consensus opinion of this forum to be the final arbiter (which it appears I may lose, in this case ☹).

On this image, the technical aspects are well-done. I would not expect anything less from XRay who is an accomplished photographer.

You will just have to go to sleep tonight knowing that I disagree with you that this technically well-done image of an unidentified pile on a non-descript beach at sunset has sufficient value for use within the Wiki family.

If you are going to comment back, please respond to this issue only. I’m done with the rest. --GRDN711 00:47, 9 October 2025 (UTC)

To all too: Please pay attention that the word "Wikipedia" does not occur in the guidelines. ;-) And thank you very much for considering me an accomplished photographer. But I make mistakes, and there are also a number of photos I've taken that aren't good enough for QI. I use photos for many purposes, but here in particular to show what is possible in photography. (This is limited, of course, by my knowledge, which is growing day by day.) At least this aspect is educational.
I hope everyone enjoys photography. Most of us do photography as a hobby. That means we are not driven by any commissions. This gives us the opportunity to be creative on the one hand and to approach photography projects in a relaxed manner on the other. QI is a small step toward increasing our knowledge. (Of course, opinions can vary greatly when it comes to some creatively designed photos. I am thinking of another nomination of mine—keyword ICM.) The guidelines sensibly use the word “should” rather than “must” in many places. This means, above all, that not every rule is always applicable. Have fun taking photos! Enjoy being creative! --XRay 05:15, 9 October 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 5 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote?   --Lvova 14:30, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

File:Norderney,_Strand_--_2025_--_8971.jpg

• Nomination Sea foam washed up on the beach, Norderney, Lower Saxony, Germany --XRay 04:21, 1 October 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Comment I love it, but I think this photo should be nominated in FP, not in QI. Maybe I'm confused. --Lmbuga 05:02, 1 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose Assessing it as a possible QI, I can only say that almost nothing is in focus. It does not represent reality. It's an artistic picture, a personal review of reality--Lmbuga 05:10, 1 October 2025 (UTC)

  A small part of the foam is in focus. That was my creative intention. --XRay 06:43, 1 October 2025 (UTC)

• weak  Oppose The depth of field is indeed very shallow, but in this case, I find it perfectly acceptable as a creative tool. Unfortunately, the lens's longitudinal chromatic aberration is extremely noticeable in the rather unattractive bokeh, resulting in reddish edges in the foreground of the focal plane and blue-green edges in the background. This is a technical problem that greatly detracts from the overall impression. Unfortunately, I don't know of any simple solution for eliminating this while preserving the colours in the unaffected areas of the image. In the last millennium, I would probably have printed it on Agfa Portriga and possibly toned it sepia ;-)
  Sorry for the lengthy comment, but I actually really like the photo's composition and concept. --Smial 11:06, 3 October 2025 (UTC)

• @Smial: I prefer a longer comment to a few quickly written sentences that sometimes affect me personally and even annoy me (keywords: “Doesn't fit in Wikipedia”). I would therefore like to express my sincere thanks for your helpful comment. Thank you! --XRay 08:41, 6 October 2025 (UTC)

•  Comment I would have liked to say that I think the photo is very beautiful.--Lmbuga 21:02, 5 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Info Perhaps a note: Playing with an open aperture offers many advantages. I like to do that sometimes. But the technical capabilities of a lens are limited by physical principles (see, for example, de:Kritische Blende, unfortunately no English page). Blurring is therefore to be expected, especially with an extremely closed or open aperture. I don't want to gloss over any flaws in my photos, but perhaps this information will be interesting for others to understand. --XRay 08:47, 6 October 2025 (UTC)+
•  Support Nth review. I feel bad about opposing it. My head tells me it's not QI, but my heart tells me otherwise. Even Cervantes' Don Quixote has errors. Very nice and good quality, in my opinion.--Lmbuga 12:38, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Weak support Юрий Д.К. 16:37, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Support I would agree to promote it. It's quite a stunning picture. -- Harmonide 11:48, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote?   --Lvova 14:30, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

File:Norderney,_Promenade_--_2025_--_8958.jpg

• Nomination Photographic art based on a view of the promenade in Norderney, Lower Saxony, Germany --XRay 03:48, 30 September 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Oppose Sorry, perhaps FP, but not QI IMO. --Lmbuga 12:28, 30 September 2025 (UTC)

• ICM photos also have their place in QI. The criteria should generally be met, but do not have to be. For example, sharpness cannot be used as an evaluation criterion for this type of photo. --XRay 06:47, 1 October 2025 (UTC)

•  Support ICM photography can indeed qualify as QI when executed with intention and technical control. This work demonstrates a clear artistic vision, balanced composition, and a harmonious color palette. In my view, it meets the QI criteria for its genre. Best regards, --Radomianin 09:02, 1 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Support Per Radomianin. Having tried ICM myself, I see a clear difference between my lacklustre attempts and XRay's nominations --Julesvernex2 10:11, 2 October 2025 (UTC)

• A photographer friend of mine got me excited about ICM and even gave a lecture on it. The technique is very simple, he said. My first attempts didn't look particularly great. It took time before I was able to combine the desired motif with the right camera movement. So keep experimenting, even if some of the results may be surprising. --XRay 11:04, 2 October 2025 (UTC)

•  Comment I'm sorry: there's no doubt that my knowledge is limited. I withdraw my vote and hope I don't put my foot in it again. Thank you for being there to correct me.--Lmbuga 18:15, 2 October 2025 (UTC)

• Lmbuga, I don't think you have anything to be sorry about: your argument was undoubtedly worth debating and has generated an interesting discussion! --Julesvernex2 18:29, 2 October 2025 (UTC)

•  Oppose disturbing foreground, weird composition. Unlike a few other photos in the corresponding categories, the use of this technique of alienation in this photo does not support a particular motif, a special lighting situation or anything else that would be worth highlighting. It is also not eye-catching at all from a purely graphic point of view. --Smial 18:51, 4 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose I agree that this image is not good enough to merit the QI rating. In general, it would be worthwhile for XRay to start a discussion in the QIC talk page on whether and how such images are to be evaluated. --Tagooty 09:29, 5 October 2025 (UTC)

• I won't start the discussion, as I've had it many times before. It's pointless to discuss it, and even frustrating. Basically, there are two groups – to put it simply: those who only see things through the eyes of Wikipedia and only know articles that are clearly structured. Articles such as en:Intentional camera movement are usually unknown to them. The others see Wikimedia Commons as a media archive for everyone, both within the Wikimedia world and outside it. In this case, you can often see the possibilities for using such photos. It may be that this division into two different groups is just my impression, but I have experienced it very often here. It is important to me to demonstrate the possibilities of photography. This includes photos of the type presented here. And rules from our QIC Rules can only be applied where they make sense. Photos of this type are also valuable to me in my photography courses to demonstrate possibilities. I think it's important to explore different topics in photography. And, by the way, there are Wikipedia pages with relevant photos for many of these topics. --XRay 11:49, 6 October 2025 (UTC)

•  Support Юрий Д.К. 16:40, 5 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per others.--Lmbuga 20:48, 5 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose I didn’t speak up before due to the pressure of the majority, but now it’s easier to express myself. It’s also hard for me to judge such photos by the standards of this project. Lvova 21:48, 5 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Support --LucaLindholm 20:32, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per Lvova. --Sebring12Hrs 00:39, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Comment Images submitted here in QI are more of a documentary nature and are evaluated according to their technical characteristics. But this is art, and in my opinion, it defies any qualitative evaluation. I have become curious myself and would like to experiment with ICM, but QI is not a platform for discussing such exhibits. --Syntaxys 03:42, 7 October 2025 (UTC)

• To be honest, I don't find the photos to have the supposedly necessary documentary character. Perhaps you can help me with a source. The term “educational” is also meant in a broad sense. I suspect that the narrower view stems from the past. I have always understood Commons to be a media archive—as are the goals of this project. Creative works were also less common in the past. But that does not exclude them. In my opinion, they are also explicitly educational in a photographic sense. In my opinion, the entire spectrum of photography should be covered—including here at QIC. --XRay 07:53, 9 October 2025 (UTC)

•  Oppose I'm on the opposing side on this one. -- Harmonide 11:49, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 6 oppose → Decline?   --Lvova 14:29, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

File:Stolberg_(September_2025)_4.jpg

• Nomination Stolberg Castle in the Harz Mountains --Romzig 17:53, 28 September 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Comment In my opinion, it needs perspective correction and it's a bit underexposed--Lmbuga 20:36, 28 September 2025 (UTC)

  Thanks for the review. I've uploaded a new version. --Romzig 18:00, 30 September 2025 (UTC)

   Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 12:22, 1 October 2025 (UTC)

•  Oppose The buildings are leaning too much at right. Sorry to oppose. --Sebring12Hrs 22:24, 1 October 2025 (UTC)

  Thanks for the review. I've uploaded a new version. --Romzig 14:34, 4 October 2025 (UTC)

  Sorry but it's leaning everywhere. --Sebring12Hrs 07:52, 6 October 2025 (UTC)

•  Weak oppose Would it be possible to work on the light? It's a bit dark, I'm afraid. -- Harmonide 11:54, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

  @Harmonide: pls put your comments higher than QICtotal template. And it is absolutely not dark. Lvova 14:27, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline?   --Lvova 14:27, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

File:Sunset_on_the_sea_in_Komodo_National_Park,_Indonesia,_20250825_1755_3328.jpg

• Nomination Sunset on the sea in Komodo National Park, Indonesia --Jakubhal 04:09, 1 October 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
   Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 04:56, 1 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose This is a good image but a personal one. I know you like it, but IMO it does not have sufficient value per QI guidelines above to be more distinctive as a sunset than the other 17 images of this sunset you took, nor the 263,056 found if you search on “sunset” in Commons. Sorry, not QI on value. --GRDN711 04:57, 1 October 2025 (UTC)

   Comment You are not an objective judge of what is valuable and what is not; your opinions are subjective and, in my view, unjustified --Jakubhal 05:32, 1 October 2025 (UTC)

•  Comment Not the best sharpness, but per Jakubhal !!! I personnaly don't care what is the amount of pictures of sunset in Commons. What about Cathedral Notre-Dame de Paris ? And "valuable" is an argument usefull for VIC, not QIC to me. Every sunset is unique because not at the same place in the world. --Sebring12Hrs 08:18, 1 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Support per Jakubhal and Sebring12Hrs Юрий Д.К. 10:30, 1 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Comment We are not discussing the VI definition of “valuable”. That’s a different rating system. This is the QI requirement (above) of “Value - Our main goal is to encourage quality images being contributed to Wikicommons, valuable for Wikimedia and other projects”.
  

The nominator seems intent on nominating all or most of the 18 images he created of this sunset on a lake. Sunsets occur every 24 hours everywhere in the world every day. And it is easy to make an sunset image with todays cameras or cell pbones that looks somewhat colorful.

A sunset that is spectacular, with an interesting location, a topic or a special mood would have QI value.

A personal picture of another sunset is just another sunset, and IMO of questionable QI value. --GRDN711 16:43, 1 October 2025 (UTC)

@GRDN711: Please don’t ascribe intentions to me. I’m simply nominating images that, in my view, meet the QI criteria. I fully agree with Sebring12Hrs that you are mixing QI with VI principles, which are different rating systems. I’ve noticed before that you sometimes confuse QIC with FPC or VI rules, which has repeatedly led to community discussions that gained no support for your position. As I and most others here understand it, the QI value criterion is not about global uniqueness or spectacular subjects. ---- Jakubhal 17:56, 1 October 2025 (UTC)

@Jakubhal: You have nominated 6 of the 18 sunset images for QI ratings on this page alone. There is no mixing of FPC and VI definitions in my opinion on this. I am just struggling with how these 6 sunset images (rather ordinary composition but reasonably sharp and correctly exposed) would be "valuable for Wikimedia and other projects" going forward. I would be interested in your thoughts on that point. --GRDN711 01:16, 2 October 2025 (UTC)

@GRDN711: I can’t help but feel that your comment comes across as a bit personal, since you are very carefully counting how many and which of my images I nominate. At the same time, I notice that when it comes to other nominators’ sunset photos, you also start similar discussions. For the record, many of my images - including sunsets - are already in wide use on Wikipedia and outside of it. Here are just a few examples of sunrises and sunsets that I found within a few minutes: link 1, link 2, link 3, link 4. Jakubhal 05:37, 2 October 2025 (UTC)

@Jakubhal: The images in discussion here are only the 6 sunset images that you have nominated; not the other images you have made. It is not personal. They were counted because all 6 were nominated and are almost identical. While this sunset motif is technically acceptable, IMHO I just don’t see them being used in Wikimedia and other projects following the QI guideline for value above. That's my opinion.--GRDN711 04:53, 5 October 2025 (UTC)

@GRDN711: No one shares this view with you. You’ve started pointless discussions not only under my images, but also under other users’ nominations, based on your personal feelings about the subject’s "value." At this point, you’re wasting the community’s time. All of us could spend our time better than taking part in this. --Jakubhal 06:48, 5 October 2025 (UTC)

Jakubhal, I agree with every your word. Lvova 19:31, 2 October 2025 (UTC)

•  Support I recently learned that very similar or almost identical images can be nominated for QI. If two almost identical images cannot be nominated, the words used to say this should be expressed in the Images guidelines. The image guidelines do not state that. The photo is good.. The photo is good.--Lmbuga 01:28, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Support per Lmbuga. Could e.g. be useful inside or outside wikimedia projects to illustrate lenticular clouds. --Smial 12:45, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Support Interesting and beautiful colours. I side with the promoters. -- Harmonide 11:51, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote?   --Lvova 14:28, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

File:SW_AB-13_IIT_Gandhinagar_Gujarat_Sep25_A7CR_07891.jpg

• Nomination South west corner, Academic Block AB-13, IIT Gandhinagar --Tagooty 14:15, 29 September 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 15:23, 29 September 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose The light is very poor for a photo. The building is too dark overall, especially the left side. Perhaps some improvements can be made. However, the current version is not a high-quality image in my opinion. Please discuss. -- Spurzem 09:15, 30 September 2025 (UTC)

• @Spurzem:  Done Raised exposure of the building. Please review the new version. --Tagooty 12:36, 2 October 2025 (UTC)

•  Comment Exposure is better, but a slight PC would be good at left (look at the fences). --Sebring12Hrs 00:42, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Support somewhat soft at the left, but good enough for A4 size printout. --Smial 12:50, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Support It's OK for me. -- Harmonide 11:59, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote?   --Lvova 14:28, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

File:UlicaGenerałaStanisławaSosabowskiego-StojakiRowerowe-PrądnikBiały-POL,_Kraków.jpg

• Nomination: UlicaGenerałaStanisławaSosabowskiego-StojakiRowerowe-PrądnikBiały-POL, Kraków --Igor123121 05:11, 29 September 2025 (UTC)
• Review  Support Good quality. --Llez 05:26, 29 September 2025 (UTC)
   Oppose Perspective distortion --Jakubhal 05:32, 29 September 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per Jakubhal. --Sebring12Hrs 08:58, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
• @Sebring12Hrs: @Jakubhal:  Done? Igor123121 19:56, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Comment perspective is ok now, but the sharpness is at the limit. --Sebring12Hrs 16:57, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Inconclusive result after 8 consensual review days   --Peulle 06:50, 9 October 2025 (UTC)

File:Rail_transport_infrastructure_map_-_FR_-_Île-de-France.svg

• Nomination: Previously unassessed. Geographically correct rail transport infrastructure map of Île-de-France (France), as of 2024. --Benjism89 09:16, 28 September 2025 (UTC)
• Review
   Oppose I admire the effort, but there are a few things to fix for QI: 1) The choice of font isn't great for readability. 2) Some of the text is above other text. 3) the highlights behind text isn't always perfectly aligned with the text itself. --MB-one 16:02, 29 September 2025 (UTC)
  Thanks for your review. 1) I believe this font (Ubuntu) is quite easy to read, and there are only a few opensource fonts supported by QGis. 2) I found one place where there was text above another one (Versailles-Rive-Droite), please tell me if you saw another one. 3) An unalignment between text and highlight is highly possible as I have to correct manually the position of texts when they are one above the other in QGis' export, but I made another check and could find one --Benjism89 17:49, 29 September 2025 (UTC)
•  Support Good quality. ReneeWrites 21:43, 30 September 2025 (UTC)

Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Inconclusive result after 8 consensual review days   --Peulle 06:49, 9 October 2025 (UTC)

Timetable (day 8 after nomination)

• Wed 01 Oct → Thu 09 Oct
• Thu 02 Oct → Fri 10 Oct
• Fri 03 Oct → Sat 11 Oct
• Sat 04 Oct → Sun 12 Oct
• Sun 05 Oct → Mon 13 Oct
• Mon 06 Oct → Tue 14 Oct
• Tue 07 Oct → Wed 15 Oct
• Wed 08 Oct → Thu 16 Oct
• Thu 09 Oct → Fri 17 Oct